Absolutely not. Not every jabbed develop antibodies at all and most jabbed loose antibodies fast (this is one of their reasons for permanent boosters or revaccinations bullshit). Also antibodies could present in never jabbed due to previous contractions from illnesses, or as response to contact with pathogens in small quantities not enough to develop an illness. So antibodies can't be a definitive marker of vaccination with SputnikV/AstraZeneca, especially in the span of declared six months of "protection".
Also, it is explicitly stated in docs on SputnikV that all components are go out of body very fast, and that is one of the main reasons in claims about vaccine safety.
Usually, substances that could last long in body used as markers. mostly different isotopes that used by body as ordinary elements for bulding body cells or bones or other parts. Such markers could stay in body and be detectable for years. Also, some elements could accumulate in different organs, but that is usually harmful for humans and especially harmful if you constantly add them. But it will be hard to distinguish if they accumulate from vaccine or other sources. Few organic substances could accumulate in liver, f.e. but they are harmfull and not distiguiseable from other sources too. Complex organic substances injected with vaccine that could possibly confidently prove a jab usually go out of body or breaked up as fast as possible, as their traces.
Also he specifically told about some unknown for public "specific test for that markers", and not usual antibodies test.
In any case, independent of what they mean under "markers", statement about markers completely contradicts with earlier statements or official documentation. Or he just lie about markers to cover complete vaccine inefficiency.
SputnikV is nearly the same as AstraZeneca, Gamalea institute and AstraZeneca since the beginnig have officially signed agreement on development of vaccine and vaccines differ only in type of adenovirus in second component. So it is not Russian-only thing.
Shortly, trying to cover absolute vaccine inefficiency and even harm, CEO of Gamalea Institute A.Ginsburg declare that 80% of vaccinated fake or bribe their vaccine status. As a ground of such insolent statement he told that there exists a test on some unnamed markers, that could show if there was real jab or not. "Fuckcheckers" tried to "explain" that statement that "markers" is just an antibodies, but that can't be a truth, because same Ginsburg multiple times stated that antibodies quickly vanish, that is why everybody needs revaccinations. Also not every vaccinated develop antibodies. And every person who once contracted hypotethical SARS-CoV-2, will also have them, so antibodies test in no way could be a proof of vaccination. All components declared in SputnikV vaccine (so AstraZeneca too), is go out from body within very short perion. It is stated in official datasheet for SputnikV. So, the only way to have some method of testing for previous vaccination is to add unnamed component in vaccine that will stay in body for a long time or forever.
So, there only two possibilities - Gamalea CEO is lying about markers to cover vaccines complete inefficiency, or Gamalea Institute is lied in papers, vaccine tests results and documents about vaccine composition and hided that something stay in test subject bodies for a long time or forever. In any case it is a 100% proof that they lied. So if they lie about that, it is highly probable that they lie about everything about vaccine.
Looks like they are in panic. They are so afraid of something, that even does not bother (or have no time) to think out some consistent and plausible lie to push that vaxx.
PS: Can't edit title, there is typo ustated -> unstated. Sorry.
Could he mean antibodies
Absolutely not. Not every jabbed develop antibodies at all and most jabbed loose antibodies fast (this is one of their reasons for permanent boosters or revaccinations bullshit). Also antibodies could present in never jabbed due to previous contractions from illnesses, or as response to contact with pathogens in small quantities not enough to develop an illness. So antibodies can't be a definitive marker of vaccination with SputnikV/AstraZeneca, especially in the span of declared six months of "protection".
Also, it is explicitly stated in docs on SputnikV that all components are go out of body very fast, and that is one of the main reasons in claims about vaccine safety.
Usually, substances that could last long in body used as markers. mostly different isotopes that used by body as ordinary elements for bulding body cells or bones or other parts. Such markers could stay in body and be detectable for years. Also, some elements could accumulate in different organs, but that is usually harmful for humans and especially harmful if you constantly add them. But it will be hard to distinguish if they accumulate from vaccine or other sources. Few organic substances could accumulate in liver, f.e. but they are harmfull and not distiguiseable from other sources too. Complex organic substances injected with vaccine that could possibly confidently prove a jab usually go out of body or breaked up as fast as possible, as their traces.
Also he specifically told about some unknown for public "specific test for that markers", and not usual antibodies test.
In any case, independent of what they mean under "markers", statement about markers completely contradicts with earlier statements or official documentation. Or he just lie about markers to cover complete vaccine inefficiency.
SputnikV is nearly the same as AstraZeneca, Gamalea institute and AstraZeneca since the beginnig have officially signed agreement on development of vaccine and vaccines differ only in type of adenovirus in second component. So it is not Russian-only thing.
Shortly, trying to cover absolute vaccine inefficiency and even harm, CEO of Gamalea Institute A.Ginsburg declare that 80% of vaccinated fake or bribe their vaccine status. As a ground of such insolent statement he told that there exists a test on some unnamed markers, that could show if there was real jab or not. "Fuckcheckers" tried to "explain" that statement that "markers" is just an antibodies, but that can't be a truth, because same Ginsburg multiple times stated that antibodies quickly vanish, that is why everybody needs revaccinations. Also not every vaccinated develop antibodies. And every person who once contracted hypotethical SARS-CoV-2, will also have them, so antibodies test in no way could be a proof of vaccination. All components declared in SputnikV vaccine (so AstraZeneca too), is go out from body within very short perion. It is stated in official datasheet for SputnikV. So, the only way to have some method of testing for previous vaccination is to add unnamed component in vaccine that will stay in body for a long time or forever.
So, there only two possibilities - Gamalea CEO is lying about markers to cover vaccines complete inefficiency, or Gamalea Institute is lied in papers, vaccine tests results and documents about vaccine composition and hided that something stay in test subject bodies for a long time or forever. In any case it is a 100% proof that they lied. So if they lie about that, it is highly probable that they lie about everything about vaccine.
Looks like they are in panic. They are so afraid of something, that even does not bother (or have no time) to think out some consistent and plausible lie to push that vaxx.
PS: Can't edit title, there is typo ustated -> unstated. Sorry.