Area for floors 56-59 is 37611sqft-44133sqft while it is 41588sqft-43850sqft for 60-63. Given the formula for the area of a hexagon, at which floor the equilateral hexagon occurs could be determined for sure. Just plug in these numbers and the change from floor to floor is obviously linear on each edge.
Thanks for finding those plans. Actually they lead to believe I'm completely wrong on all this. The floors seem to be gradually becoming octagonal. It's a trick of the angle photos of the building are taken whereby the additional two sides are not visible and I took them for corners of a hexagon instead of additional sides.
I thought floor plans for such buildings were supposed to be available for request at some office of the City.
https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LjJgTjs9qMs/T_7yqj49agI/AAAAAAAAFlc/CTbnq34q0jw/s1600/7353421608_904359759a_k.jpg
Also could deduce something from the floor plans shown here: https://www.worldofarchi.com/2012/07/1-world-trade-center-by-skidmore-owings.html
Area for floors 56-59 is 37611sqft-44133sqft while it is 41588sqft-43850sqft for 60-63. Given the formula for the area of a hexagon, at which floor the equilateral hexagon occurs could be determined for sure. Just plug in these numbers and the change from floor to floor is obviously linear on each edge.
What is also fascinating is:
floor plans for 45-49 is here: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-GSdpzWHFBBA/T_7w_n2z6WI/AAAAAAAAFh0/UwiVvpUcPa8/s1600/101.jpg
floor plans for 56-59 is here: https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-MVlHFpq5hts/T_7xBL5ecJI/AAAAAAAAFiA/Dvh1S5P7aK4/s1600/102.jpg
floor plans for 60-63 is here: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-pWM6RGrxxjY/T_7xCdiloYI/AAAAAAAAFiI/iB_sa2WIUjY/s1600/103.jpg
floor plans for 70-79 is here: https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_ib4iH09zZg/T_7xD5rLffI/AAAAAAAAFiQ/1zAAOB5suqM/s1600/104.jpg
floor plans for 80-89 is here: https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-qV5ABLBtDWo/T_7xF5NwRBI/AAAAAAAAFiY/vWhMl96AaMU/s1600/105.jpg
floor plans for 90 is here: https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-qV5ABLBtDWo/T_7xF5NwRBI/AAAAAAAAFiY/vWhMl96AaMU/s1600/106.jpg
Why is 64-69 missing? It must be 66-67.
Thanks for finding those plans. Actually they lead to believe I'm completely wrong on all this. The floors seem to be gradually becoming octagonal. It's a trick of the angle photos of the building are taken whereby the additional two sides are not visible and I took them for corners of a hexagon instead of additional sides.
Yup seems so in hindsight. Appreciate the self-criticism and awareness. Cheers.