Gives example religious or medical exemption declaration letters.
Discusses the fact that the ctrl system wants people to believe there is no rule of law or legal resources, and thus voluntarily give up any legal resources prematurely.
>The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled the CDC had no authority in extending an eviction moratorium because said agency is not a legislative body and is only given authority by such under Article I, Section I, of the U.S. Constitution. If this weren't a devastating enough blow to the perceived authority of some tyrants, Australia has announced the renaming of 'crown' deaths from those who die 'from' to those who die 'with'. This acknowledges the inability to confirm illness or death caused by a particle, nor by amplified and misleading tests. The same is true for the difference between 'cases' and 'deaths' in general. Now the public is being told they have no rights in opting out of or filing an exemption with schools or employers for 'mandated' medical force. This is false. Federal law protects employees and most students by providing them with religious exemptions, defined by 42 US Code, Sec. 2000e, (J), as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII. For experimental medical force there are far more things that provide protection, from Federal to International law. One must merely declare and state, rather than submit - implying authority to reject - such an exemption in order to qualify under the law. You do not need to provide institutional proof if you hold sincere religious beliefs, observances, and practices.
Gives example religious or medical exemption declaration letters.
Discusses the fact that the ctrl system wants people to believe there is no rule of law or legal resources, and thus voluntarily give up any legal resources prematurely.
>The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled the CDC had no authority in extending an eviction moratorium because said agency is not a legislative body and is only given authority by such under Article I, Section I, of the U.S. Constitution. If this weren't a devastating enough blow to the perceived authority of some tyrants, Australia has announced the renaming of 'crown' deaths from those who die 'from' to those who die 'with'. This acknowledges the inability to confirm illness or death caused by a particle, nor by amplified and misleading tests. The same is true for the difference between 'cases' and 'deaths' in general. Now the public is being told they have no rights in opting out of or filing an exemption with schools or employers for 'mandated' medical force. This is false. Federal law protects employees and most students by providing them with religious exemptions, defined by 42 US Code, Sec. 2000e, (J), as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII. For experimental medical force there are far more things that provide protection, from Federal to International law. One must merely declare and state, rather than submit - implying authority to reject - such an exemption in order to qualify under the law. You do not need to provide institutional proof if you hold sincere religious beliefs, observances, and practices.