They are also being sued for it by the childhealthalliance.
Apparently it is against federal law to keep the eua active. The INSTANT that approval is granted, eua is revoked by federal law. They are banking on a semantical loophole because the two products are FUNCTIONALLY identical - but not identical.
Intriguing to be sure, but I am always hesitant about dates and events. I do definitely believe parts of what he says though, a good deal of that is very plausible
It's all true
They are also being sued for it by the childhealthalliance.
Apparently it is against federal law to keep the eua active. The INSTANT that approval is granted, eua is revoked by federal law. They are banking on a semantical loophole because the two products are FUNCTIONALLY identical - but not identical.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/CHD-v.-FDA-Submitted-Complaint-8.31.21.pdf
It was filed in tennessee, in the US.
My understanding (may be wrong - f*ing yahoo news) is they are being sued for violation of federal law or statute.
Apparently it is absolutely federally illegal in the US to have an EUA and an fda approval simultaneously (for obvious reasons)
Intriguing to be sure, but I am always hesitant about dates and events. I do definitely believe parts of what he says though, a good deal of that is very plausible