It's not like an important or actual conspiracy. That's why no one has made a separate post on it.
Ice cream sales are up all over the place because there are multiple locations around major cities where people can go. People who regularly order ice cream will get the ice cream when they have the chance and will go to another location if it's still convenient.
It only affects the "owners" because it's not always their machines that get fixed so they feel like they are losing sales to competitors.
Honestly, the bigger conspiracy is that the "owners" don't own anything and just get a percentage of profits.
No. Corporate gets the same money from McDonald's A as McDonald's B if they are in the same area. It's just that A may not get the money and B probably will. Corporate is making the same money saleswise because it charges for the sale separately from rent. Starbucks can't do this and loses money on rent if there is one across the street.
It's not like an important or actual conspiracy. That's why no one has made a separate post on it.
Ice cream sales are up all over the place because there are multiple locations around major cities where people can go. People who regularly order ice cream will get the ice cream when they have the chance and will go to another location if it's still convenient.
It only affects the "owners" because it's not always their machines that get fixed so they feel like they are losing sales to competitors.
Honestly, the bigger conspiracy is that the "owners" don't own anything and just get a percentage of profits.
No. Corporate gets the same money from McDonald's A as McDonald's B if they are in the same area. It's just that A may not get the money and B probably will. Corporate is making the same money saleswise because it charges for the sale separately from rent. Starbucks can't do this and loses money on rent if there is one across the street.