I've seen this misinfo repeated by doctors and PhDs which people think gives it credibility. Please read your source material before making such bold claims.
As much as I like Dr Sherri Tenpenny she still pushes this incorrect 65% figure allegedly from SAGE. Seems like no one is correcting these people and everyone is getting into their own echo chamber.
I read the abstract of the SAGE report when I first heard of it, and it says they predict approximately 65% of COVID patients in hospital will be vaccinated. Not that 65% of vaccine recipients will end up in the hospital. Huge difference, and the only way you could get that wrong is it you never read the study but only read a disinfo website claiming it said so, such as the headline of this article https://lichtnahrung2015.wordpress.com/2021/04/30/third-covid-wave-will-kill-or-hospitalize-60-to-70-people-who-took-both-the-vaccine-doses-says-official-uk-govt-model/
But even that article goes on to explain the reality of it. So she only read the clickbait headline or worse yet maybe she is just repeating something she heard from another doctor. How dumb can she be? Otherwise she seems very intelligent but this is just an annoying mistake.
Secondly for the 80% spontaneous abortion figure, this was a mistake brought about by someone looking at a section of a study where the graph doesn't show the true denominator.
"To calculate the actual miscarriage rate for those vaccinated in the first and second trimesters, you’d need to divide the number of miscarriages by the total number of completed pregnancies of those who were vaccinated before 26 weeks. But we don’t have that total yet because most of those people are still pregnant. "
Long story short the study didn't last long enough to determine how many women in the first trimester had a miscarriage.
That mistake seems like a more reasonable one, in fact when I first read the data that claim looked correct to me too, because I didn't realize there were women still pregnant in that study. But either way, corrections need to be made so our side can stop looking stupid on some of these points. Though it would be interesting to see if that study is following up with all the women so we could get a final result.
That table isn't showing the women who had a dose in their first trimester but were still pregnant. All pregnancies (*in that particular table) were "completed" so either a birth, a miscarriage or (I imagine) an abortion. So they aren't even including those first trimester pregnancies that were still apparently ongoing in that table.
I'm still quite convinced this tech is going to screw up human fertility and cause problems, just this study wasn't able to make a conclusion as alleged, it doesn't say anything close to what people thought it did.
Yeah I don't blame people so much on that one. Unintentional misinformation. But on the first point in my title Dr. Tenpenny was just being irresponsible and no one is calling her out on it.