I'm not pro-jab by any means, but this is the dumbest comparison possible. One would expect that if a certain population suffers from a disease that they're also going to have the most wide spread usage of a treatment for said disease. The more wide spread the disease, the more wide spread usage of the treatment.
If the page references wasn't filled with so much rhetoric I might actually take a look the authors statement more closely.
" population suffers from a disease that they're also going to have the most wide spread usage of a treatment for said disease."
You don't treat diseases with vaccines. Vaccines are preventative prophylactics.
Do you even know how a vaccine works? It is a pathogen you enter into your system in the HOPES of building an immunity to said pathogen.
It's the same concept as injecting yourself with snake venom in the hopes of building up an immunity to snake bites. You are literally injecting the disease into your body on purpose.
In the past, when they referred to 'flu shot', these were not vaccines, but actual treatments such as ivermectin.
"If the page references wasn't filled with so much rhetoric I might actually take a look the authors statement more closely."
Reddit is pro-vax and controlled through the distribution of crypto. So you have failed at even the most basic of deductive reasoning skills.
Or is it that you don't think I can't look over your user history to ensure that you are not a shill? Do you think name calling will stop me from doing so? Do you think that you can examine others for validity, but that you are somehow above scrutiny?
" I might actually take a look the authors statement more closely."
So you are in a different class from the rest of us? Untouchable even, beyond criticism? You stand above us, do you not sir?
I'm not pro-jab by any means, but this is the dumbest comparison possible. One would expect that if a certain population suffers from a disease that they're also going to have the most wide spread usage of a treatment for said disease. The more wide spread the disease, the more wide spread usage of the treatment.
If the page references wasn't filled with so much rhetoric I might actually take a look the authors statement more closely.
You don't treat diseases with vaccines. Vaccines are preventative prophylactics.
Do you even know how a vaccine works? It is a pathogen you enter into your system in the HOPES of building an immunity to said pathogen.
It's the same concept as injecting yourself with snake venom in the hopes of building up an immunity to snake bites. You are literally injecting the disease into your body on purpose.
In the past, when they referred to 'flu shot', these were not vaccines, but actual treatments such as ivermectin.
Yah.. I'm looking over your post history now.
Found the reddit faggot.
Reddit is pro-vax and controlled through the distribution of crypto. So you have failed at even the most basic of deductive reasoning skills.
Or is it that you don't think I can't look over your user history to ensure that you are not a shill? Do you think name calling will stop me from doing so? Do you think that you can examine others for validity, but that you are somehow above scrutiny?
So you are in a different class from the rest of us? Untouchable even, beyond criticism? You stand above us, do you not sir?
Hm... Did you in fact find yourself maybe?
I know it hurts, bro. Have some copium.