It's not true. He didn't even win the case. Here is a video of Patrick King himself finally admitting he didn't win and had no effect on the regulations.
They literally wrote the subpoena was done in the wrong place and even if it wasn't it was irrelevant to the case.
It's no victory. It's smoke and mirrors and intentionally misleading bullshit by a grifter.
It's not true. He didn't even win the case. Here is a video of Patrick King himself finally admitting he didn't win and had no effect on the regulations.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/F6XvZCbok1SP/
No they did not concede that.
They said it was irrelevant to the case and he did not prove that it was needed for the case.Everyone is treating it as some kind of gotcha.
You think the government is going to deliver a sample of a deadly virus to a clown in a ticket case?
Seriously dumb.
They literally wrote the subpoena was done in the wrong place and even if it wasn't it was irrelevant to the case. It's no victory. It's smoke and mirrors and intentionally misleading bullshit by a grifter.
No, the government refused the request because a sample of the virus is fucking irrelevant to a $1200 ticket case.
No.
They said the subpoena was not filed in the right place, and that it was not material evidence for a fucking ticket case.