CDC’s own data shows 3-4x more new cases in vaxxed vs unvaxxed. Is this even a treatment?
(media.conspiracies.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Not to mention that the US now claims that 70% of our population has had 1 jab and close to 60 have had two jabs.
They are claiming that over 90 percent of new cases are in the unvaxxed population.
If there is a virus, and if the vaccines are effective that is the type of ratio you should expect, that because 60-70% of the population is vaccinated, 90% of new cases are in the unvaxxed population and roughly 10% are in the vaxxed population.
But in the same breath as proclaimed ng that, they are trying to explain to you that in other countries like israel, or in places like the UK where in both regions have about 60% of their populations vaxxed the reason for the extraordinary amount of infections in the vaccinated population is due to the fact that so they have a 60% vaccination rate. They go into explain this by asking you to imagine that it is not 60% vaccinated, but instead imagine it's 100% vaccinated and then show you how it works that way.
Again, in the us they are claiming that 60% vaccinated means 90% of infections are in the unvaccinated, but in other countries 60% vaccinated means that 50+% of infections will be in the vaccinated population because if 100% of the people were vaccinated all the cases would be in the vaccinated group.
Triple think
Yeah essentially there’s clearly no absolute risk reduction as measured by difference in case incidence between groups. Even if you normalize for preference this remains true.