So far I haven't heard from anyone who can tell me why they think Dan Dicks can read and interpret the FDA document that is the basis of OP's post.
When you look up Dan Dicks you don't get anything that says he's in a position to be able to read, understand, and critique a high-level instruction set for bio-molecular testing.
The only reference to him I can find on the Internet aside from Mike Adams' reference in OP's post is a small-time arrest at an anti-racism protest in Vancouver 14 months ago. If he has any background that would mean his opinion on CDC testing instructions actually counts for anything it seems to be well hidden.
So again I'm asking why anyone should think his opinion is worth anything?
Except the whole lead paragraph is about him and what he thinks the document says, and I'm asking what reason anyone would have for listening to him in the first place?
So far I haven't heard from anyone who can tell me why they think Dan Dicks can read and interpret the FDA document that is the basis of OP's post.
When you look up Dan Dicks you don't get anything that says he's in a position to be able to read, understand, and critique a high-level instruction set for bio-molecular testing.
The only reference to him I can find on the Internet aside from Mike Adams' reference in OP's post is a small-time arrest at an anti-racism protest in Vancouver 14 months ago. If he has any background that would mean his opinion on CDC testing instructions actually counts for anything it seems to be well hidden.
So again I'm asking why anyone should think his opinion is worth anything?
Except the whole lead paragraph is about him and what he thinks the document says, and I'm asking what reason anyone would have for listening to him in the first place?
Where does it say that?