Yeah, it sounded bizarre to me too at first, since this is what we have all been led to believe. They have in fact fooled us all. I thought the people who said "there is no virus" were actually crazy conspiracy theorists for the past year and a half...
But now that I've studied the "scientific" methods that are used by Virologists, it's painfully obviously that there's nothing close to what could be considered scientific involved in their processes.
Firstly, Virology redefined the meaning of "isolation". No virus has ever actually been isolated in a lab. What they call "isolation", is in fact fabrication of dead/damaged/foreign organic matter, which they then record interesting looking parts of under an electron microscope, without ever isolating anything at all. Various virologists have proven this, including even the one who invented this method of "isolation", by recreating identical images using uncontaminated control samples which never contained any virus.
Secondly, Virology redefined what it means to sequence a gnome. They have never actually fully sequenced any virus, which should be obvious at this point, since they wouldn't be able to do that without first isolating a virus. Instead, what they do is take a very short sequence from random particles, and then use mental/computational algorithms to fabricate the rest of the sequence. That's why they have never been able to recreate the same sequence independently, or from any other sample, without using a template created from the initial sequence they fabricated.
Immigration sorry, none of that is true. The science on this is obvious and public and independent. But I’m not going to argue with you about it. You have every right to believe what you like.
I don't expect most people to be able to entertain the idea, so I'm not surprised by this rebuttal. You have every right to blindly "trust the science", as most people do. Even I have spent the last year and a half dismissing anyone who said things like "there is no virus" as crazy conspiracy theorists without a second thought, even though I am far less biased towards the establishment than most people.
I would have continued to do so, had I not actually studied the processes used by Virologists, and even after understanding just how incredibly flawed the "science" is, it was still hard for me to come to terms with the situation.
Yeah, it sounded bizarre to me too at first, since this is what we have all been led to believe. They have in fact fooled us all. I thought the people who said "there is no virus" were actually crazy conspiracy theorists for the past year and a half...
But now that I've studied the "scientific" methods that are used by Virologists, it's painfully obviously that there's nothing close to what could be considered scientific involved in their processes.
Firstly, Virology redefined the meaning of "isolation". No virus has ever actually been isolated in a lab. What they call "isolation", is in fact fabrication of dead/damaged/foreign organic matter, which they then record interesting looking parts of under an electron microscope, without ever isolating anything at all. Various virologists have proven this, including even the one who invented this method of "isolation", by recreating identical images using uncontaminated control samples which never contained any virus.
Secondly, Virology redefined what it means to sequence a gnome. They have never actually fully sequenced any virus, which should be obvious at this point, since they wouldn't be able to do that without first isolating a virus. Instead, what they do is take a very short sequence from random particles, and then use mental/computational algorithms to fabricate the rest of the sequence. That's why they have never been able to recreate the same sequence independently, or from any other sample, without using a template created from the initial sequence they fabricated.
Immigration sorry, none of that is true. The science on this is obvious and public and independent. But I’m not going to argue with you about it. You have every right to believe what you like.
I don't expect most people to be able to entertain the idea, so I'm not surprised by this rebuttal. You have every right to blindly "trust the science", as most people do. Even I have spent the last year and a half dismissing anyone who said things like "there is no virus" as crazy conspiracy theorists without a second thought, even though I am far less biased towards the establishment than most people.
I would have continued to do so, had I not actually studied the processes used by Virologists, and even after understanding just how incredibly flawed the "science" is, it was still hard for me to come to terms with the situation.
I respect your right to believe whatever you like.