Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

53
Round Table: How To Be Reasonably Certain A Source Of Information Is Accurate?
posted 4 years ago by clemaneuverers [M] 4 years ago by clemaneuverers +54 / -1

Thanks to u/v8power for the excellent suggestion!

It's a tricky topic!

This is 1 of 2 round tables this time, due to a tie.

Thanks to everyone who made suggestions or voted!

38 comments share
38 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– 90snonconformist 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

E-prime helps me through a lot of mess. The fallacy of "is-ness"! How claiming something* is* presupposes the thing to be stable and unchanging and only one thing, unconnected and that your view of it "is" absolute and unaffected by your own nervous system. Anyways...this is all sort of off-topic as I think others have answered better than I have. At least, they seem like good sources of information from the upvote count, that's important right? Ha ha, just kidding there! Just kiddin.

But yeah, this sub should absolutely adore Robert Anton Wilson! You do,ndont you? His specialty was 'conspiracy' from a philosophic angle. I'm still studying him but please do yourself a favor and read Cosmic Trigger triology or or Quantum Psychology or even just his Wikipedia entry!

That out of the way, yes, as others have said, who, what, where, when...with very little why! Is usually the opposite way around. Whole news articles concerned with why someone did this thing on this day over there.

From there, as others have mentioned, verification by independent parties. Etc.

Thing is, as ol R.A.W. points out, the entire thing could be an elaborate conspiracy!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 90snonconformist 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Tel;Dr...I could be in a coma dreaming all this. It seems likevtreating things as probabilities vs possibilities gets me closer to the truth. Anything is possible, not all things probable. Though, many improbable conspiracies get away from public notice exactly by being, or seeming, heh heh, improbable!

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy