Well those forum is of course infiltrated,and not only by flat-earther provocateurs.
u/DavidColeIntrepid : you wanna have shills shot down go to GA. However I don't know which GA mods should or shouldn't be trusted for sure. Some are good guys for sure,but I wouldn't be sure about all people and mods there. However on conspiracies.win situation is for sure worse about it.
Moreover - people on conspiracies.win are not "dangerous ones" here. Majority of red.dit fury is concentrated on GA and "Q anon" currently. Or because it is real or because of giving credibility - but that's the fact. Have we our own "debunkers" on red.dit ? No.
Cleaning here ? Already too late I guess. If I am right 1/3rd of users can already be moles.I wouldn't point with my finger as I could make mistake... But it is good you posted this thing. Revealing enemy methodology warns about subversion and makes moles lives harder.
Well those forum is of course infiltrated,and not only by flat-earther provocateurs.
u/DavidColeIntrepid : you wanna have shills shot down go to GA. However I don't know which GA mods should or shouldn't be trusted for sure. Some are good guys for sure,but I wouldn't be sure about all people and mods there. However on conspiracies.win situation is for sure worse about it.
Moreover - people on conspiracies.win are not "dangerous ones" here. Majority of red.dit fury is concentrated on GA and "Q anon" currently. Or because it is real or because of giving credibility - but that's the fact. Have we our own "debunkers" on red.dit ? No.
Cleaning here ? Already too late I guess. If I am right 1/3rd of users can already be moles.I wouldn't point with my finger as I could make mistake... But it is good you posted this thing. Revealing enemy methodology warns about subversion and makes moles lives harder.