Fully vaccinated people have a 885% higher chance of death due to Covid-19
(dailyexpose.co.uk)
Comments (16)
sorted by:
Its interesting the way the covid vaccine trials are going. This sort of out come is not unexpected. I have a feeling more and more data like this will be surfacing as the trials continue.
If you're reading this, you Kings among men, I Implore your assistance against the Marxist scourge infecting this website.
https://communities.win/c/Meta/p/12jJUbjhju/corrupt-moderators/
The moderators of this forum are pushing ridiculous, objectively false, information to turn people away from rational deduction and supplant researchers with people who throw their hands up in the air and scream "fAkE nEwS!"
This is the communist playbook. If "air conditioning is patriarchy" and "cheeseburgers are racism" then there is no objective truth. They literally argue 2+2=5 with semantics.
We need diversity of opinion and diversity of topics. I like passing out red pills about vaccines and Covid as much as the next guy but there is a strong contingent of users who want JUST virus discussion here (and still call every point of data "fAkE nEwS!") We need a UFO.win and an Occult.win. Matter of fact we need a conspiracy.win that doesn't ban people for questioning the corrupt moderators.
“ and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison “
This is the result of spurious correlation. Old people got the vax. Old people are being hospitalized more. Getting the vax didn't make them vulnerable, being old did.
Look at the second table over 50 numbers in that article - 80% of people over 50 with delta were vaccinated, but only 55% of hospitalizations for over 50 were.
"delta strain" is an attempt to mislabel vaccine injuries as a "new" covid.
Is it a "spurious correlation" that the deaths attributed to "delta strain" happen ONLY when people took the experimental gene therapy?
Surely, things like the spike protein being found in all the bodies organs, though it was supposed to stay localized, has nothing to do with it.
We're commenting on a link to an article saying 44 unvaccinated people and 70 partial/fully vaccinated people died after a positive identification of the Delta stain in the UK. If it's just vaccine injuries, why are the spike protein mutations published? Why is the sequence available on GISAID's database?
I have never read or heard anything suggesting the spike protein produced by getting the vaccine was meant to be localized. A major reason for the small droplet size (that slowed early production under Trump, and is still the limiting factor) was to increase the spread through the body. If you have a source, I'll read it.
Thank you for this link. I had some trouble tracking down what the quoted guy is responding to. It appears Dr. Bridle cited a Japanese biodistribution study to support the claim that 0.3 micrograms of spike protein was found outside the injection site.
There's a lot I don't know about this study, and I can only find partial copies. A data table I found shows they injected rats with 50 micrograms of [^3H]-08-A01-C0. After 48 hours roughly half was in the liver, half was still in the injection site, and ~0.3 micrograms was in other locations.
The Japanese government approved emergency use, so this appears at least acceptable by their standards. I don't know what the chemical injected is, or the details of the tracking methodology used.
If I learn more, or get the full study, I'll update. I would actually expect more spike protein than the 0.3 micrograms if they're injecting lipid and mRNA, and that much of it is getting out of the injection site. My understanding so far is the AP used a moronic "expert", and there remain concerns about the unknown effects of the vaccine, including to specific organs and functions.
There should be different studies about a lot more spike protein going outside the injection site.
I was just providing evidence against your notion that "that was supposed to happen". They have been saying it isn't supposed to happen
The way I understand it is if you're vaccinated you have a lower chance of catching covid-19, so of the people who are vaccinated and do catch it, their outcome will of course be worse because you must be very susceptible to catch covid when you had the vaccine.
Overall though, it looks like the vaccine reduces total number of cases and total number of deaths.
I mean... Why are the number of double vaxxers so much lower than unvaccinated?
That's just what you say. That's not what the data says. Why are you "anti-science"?
Dude. I'm as anti covid as it comes. I'm just smart enough to read stats. I have a master's in it. Trust me... This data doesn't tell you what you think it does. If it did, I'd be all over it.
Then how do you claim the vaccine "reduces deaths" with a nearly %900 increase in mortality rate of "fully Vaccinated"?
Again, that's what YOU say, not the data. You are anti-science.