Thanks to everyone who voted. Our featured documentary is:
-
9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality (bitchute)
Since this was was my suggestion, and it's proving to be a somewhat controversial one, here's a "short" intro / justification for my wanting to bring it to people's attention:
This film could be described as an alternative documentary to the mainstream of 9/11 truth. It is not a replacement for a documentary such as “September 11: The New Pearl Harbor”, which I hold in high regard of and recommend that everyone should see.
However. "9/11 Alchemy" explores in depth anomalous evidence that NPH and other 9/11 documentaries don’t. It also considers some evidence that NPH does cover, but does not go into much depth by way of hazarding an explanation e.g. the technical impossibility of maneuvers made by the Boeing 757 / 767 planes on 9/11.
The possibility that advanced optical holographic projection was utilized on 9/11 is considered in this documentary, in light of the publicly available R&D documentation of the technology. R&D for this technology was well funded and sought-after as long as 30 years prior to 9/11, and is likely developed to a far higher standard than is known to the general public or commercially available, since the target market was military application. One early stated, seemingly realistic aim of using this tech in a military setting was to convince an enemy that an optical holographic projection of a plane was the real deal.
Also explored in the film is the strong evidence for the use of an exotic, directed-energy, black technology, based on “zero point” energy generation, to "dustify" the World Trade Centre buildings. This evidence is also documented in great detail in the book "Where Did The Towers Go?" by Dr. Judy Wood, a pdf of which is available for download in our wiki.
Since the latter technology produces similar effects to some of those seen during hurricanes/tornadoes, the strange behaviour of Hurricane Erin on 9/11 is addressed, and how the weather conditions over New York in the 24 hours prior to the morning of 9/11 could have been conducive to the use of this technology, and potentially contributed, by design.
For a basic operating outline of a smaller scale form of this technology, please see this brief explanation. What's described in that article was achieved with second hand, decommissioned Naval machinery and no more than domestic, mains electricity.
Another concern of the film is addressing the claims of certain 9/11 researchers. One might be mistaken in believing these would be comrades of those who seriously consider the possibility of that hidden technologies were used on 9/11. The researchers concerned make claims of camera trickery on the day, and claims of there being “no planes”.
However their claims do not hold up to scrutiny, as demonstrated in the film, and it must be seriously considered that their aim is to obscure, muddle or muddy the narrative for people who are seeking the truth. They are hostile to the proponents of the issues considered in this film.
If this is your first foray into 9/11 truth, this film may not be for you; it might be better to start with “September 11: A New Pearl Harbor”. However, the issues covered by this film should be of concern to anyone who has spent time looking into the truth of 9/11, even if they seem controversial, “bat-shit insane” or “woo” on the surface.
The people who have come to dominate the 9/11 truth movement actively censor mention of the issues covered in this film, and more often than not resort to ad hominem attack, among other logical fallacies, when dealing with these issues and with those who discuss them or are proponents of them. This was something I noticed years ago before I ever looked into the topics covered in this film properly; It concerned me and eventually led me to want to give a fair hearing to what was being unfairly suppressed.
The towers came down from the top down because that was the only way to do it semi-safely. They didnt want to take a chance of tipping them over. So the buildings get imploded from the top down in sections. You’d only need 10 or so rows of charges in the core. When you set off charges from the bottom up in a slim core building like that, you risk damaging your det cord other charges leading to failure and having the tower tip over. They don’t set charges on the exterior, the core pulls everything down and in.
Larry wanted them gone becuase of asbestos and a new WTC7, but couldn’t foot the bill and implosions of a building that size would never be allowed in NYC. They must disassemble it top down. So take the cost of an implosion style demolition, and multiply that by 500 and you have your cost to mechanically demo a building like that. Now you also find a way to get 4 BILLION in insurance money to pay for the new ones as a little cherry on top.
I think Larry was late to the plan, not that he isn't complicit in everything because he is. But he bought the buildings when it was a known secret that they were asbestos infested and largely redundant. He knew before he bought them that the buildings that would cost twice what he paid to bring up to code. After purchasing he immediately took out terrorist attack insurance. As soon as that was granted the attacks then took place. It was quite clearly planned, and he knew it was going to happen, but there's no way to judge if he organized it or was involved with that. It's possible he ran in the circles where there imminent destruction was known about. If his buying was part of the plan or not is unclear to me. He may have been an opportunist. Or it may be related to making sure that the planners had complete control of the site after the destruction and clean up, through Larry's ownership, to manage it in some specific way.
The speed at which they came down tends to contradict this. The top of the building met no resistance at all as it fell. Everything below it was already on the same path of destruction as it and so it was not obstructed. The face of the buildings are already peeling away like a banana as the top descends, and there is no impedance to the top's falling from the interior structure. The entire moment is incredibly "smooth" for buildings that size, aside the massive volumes of clouds and dust, and dissimilar to any controlled demolition I've seen a video of. The buildings fall at the same speed as an object that were thrown off the top of one of them and plummeted directly to the ground.
That’s because the spine of the building was removed in a handful of shots timed milliseconds apart. The top of the building was slightly weakened by the plane and fires, once the first charge goes off if begins its fall. You can see this by the antenna falling inward first before the outer steel walls. One two or three charges/sections are blasted, the weight of the building does most of the destruction as it free falls at full speed pulling itself apart.
I am not talking out of my ass here, I run a 45ton excavator and do industrial building demos, no explosives but I know physics and building egineering. It pays my bills. If you can show me a DEW in live action irrefutably in 2021, I will give your theory some more consideration but the feat that day would have been, and was imo, done via implosion of traditional means. In my honest opinion, the building was built in such a way as they knew how they wanted to take it down one day. It was designed to be imploded in that manner.