Stillbirth Rate Rises Dramatically During Pandemic
(www.nature.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (5)
sorted by:
I love how corelation implies causationnidls the rule of thumb for scientist, but as far as vaccines are concerned corelation never implies causationnor any link whatsoever.
This article is not even representing a real study. It's probably a propaanda piece. There are many fear mongering articles out there that are intended on instilling fear in woman and parents to be to get them to go to weekly doctor visits and to not have their babies at home. They want children born into a system where there entire existence from before they are even conceived has the medical industry involved.
If there even was a rise in still births there is no telling what the cause was because there was any differences in their lives.nlike the article said Nepal had strict lockdowns only allowing them to leave for groceries. That alone holds so much potential impact on a person's health that that could have been the cause. Lack of excersise, lack of bit D, not being social etc. It could be that if everything except prenatal visits was the same that there would have been less still births.
Too many factors to conclude anything and to publish an article. Clearly propaganda
Lancet doesn't do "real studies"? What are you smoking?
I've been smoking mugwort every night to be honest. The dream herb.