When I first read about this, I misunderstood it as being similar to how bacteria become resistant when people misuse antibiotics, but this does not appear to be the case. Rather than creating "superbugs" that are difficult to treat in future patients, the effects appear to be limited to the host.
One thing that comes to mind is: could people who haven't yet contracted the disease nor taken the shot who come into contact with shed spike proteins from vaccinated people be at risk of very severe cases this way?
Read the following if you want to find out about vaccine clinical trials that were canceled because babies were far more likely to require hospitalization (dying in some cases) when infected after receiving the vaccine. There are "lessons" sections for a few viruses.
That article also cites cases where vaccines were approved only for people who had previously contracted the virus. Could it be that the COVID-19 shots out now are safer for people who have already contracted COVID-19?
Unknown. Mark Zuckerberg was right about that one.
I suspect China may have a "part two" to this virus already developed that will exterminate people who have already been infected and the various mRNA shots are a desperate measure to mitigate that--even if it injures or kills people. We can't tell the public. We can't reveal that we know what they are doing. So we just do our best to save as many people as possible, even without knowing all the details.
ADE (antibody-dependent enhancement) and vaccine associated disease enchancement (VADE) are both real.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibody-dependent_enhancement
I recommend reading the following blog post:
Antibody-Dependent Enhancement and the Coronavirus Vaccines https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2021/02/12/antibody-dependent-enhancement-and-the-coronavirus-vaccines
When I first read about this, I misunderstood it as being similar to how bacteria become resistant when people misuse antibiotics, but this does not appear to be the case. Rather than creating "superbugs" that are difficult to treat in future patients, the effects appear to be limited to the host.
One thing that comes to mind is: could people who haven't yet contracted the disease nor taken the shot who come into contact with shed spike proteins from vaccinated people be at risk of very severe cases this way?
Read the following if you want to find out about vaccine clinical trials that were canceled because babies were far more likely to require hospitalization (dying in some cases) when infected after receiving the vaccine. There are "lessons" sections for a few viruses.
Learning from the past: development of safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7566580/
That article also cites cases where vaccines were approved only for people who had previously contracted the virus. Could it be that the COVID-19 shots out now are safer for people who have already contracted COVID-19?
To your last question:
Sure, the shots might be safer when one has already had covid; however, what lasting effects are present from an experimental gene injection?
Unknown. Mark Zuckerberg was right about that one.
I suspect China may have a "part two" to this virus already developed that will exterminate people who have already been infected and the various mRNA shots are a desperate measure to mitigate that--even if it injures or kills people. We can't tell the public. We can't reveal that we know what they are doing. So we just do our best to save as many people as possible, even without knowing all the details.