Hey guys, this one's a doozy! I thought this story was worthy of being told. I already feel better having written it all out.
But if long-winded diatribes aren't your cup of tea, I won't be offended if you skip this one. ngl though, it's got some juicy bits. I'd love to know how all of this jives with the experiences and observations of many of you out there.
By 2013 I had established a well-earned reputation as one of the most prolific contributors of original content on r/conspiracy. I was optimistic, ambitious, and felt like the community I’d found was a true light in the otherwise dimming mainstream reddit rigamarole. As r/conspiracy steadily grew, so did the need for more mods.
I should briefly mention that the r/conspiracy mod team has understandably attracted a wide variety of colorful characters over the years. Many have come and gone as curious oddities, while others have been significant movers and shakers over the course of the forum’s history. Their story is for another time, and shouldn’t come from me. I can only share my own experience.
When it came time for nominations, I was delighted to receive enthusiastic and broad support as a strong favorite, and I was soon added to the team. Despite the reputation I would eventually develop, I feel like I was always viewed as a positive and constructive force on the sub, and I continued spending hours devoted to original content for r/conspiracy even after attaining moderator status.
I pledged not to let my new position interfere with my love of posting “high octane” speculation on the forum. Unfortunately, this was overly optimistic. The moment I became a mod, everything I said was used by the narrative managers as an “official” statement of r/conspiracy, despite the forum demonstrably consisting of a fantastically diverse range of opinions and ideas.
In one dramatic example, I created a “mega-thread” for r/conspiracy to discuss the bizarre MH370 disappearance in 2014. In addition to citing MSM sources (who, if you recall, had their own bizarre conspiracy theories about the incident), I also included, as an afterthought, some of the numerological patterns concerning the event, particularly the number 37.
I attributed no significance to these observations. Rather, I was including them in the megathread because it was yet another conspiratorial angle to the MH370 disappearance, and therefore was qualified to be included in the discussion. To my legitimate surprise, my words were first quoted by Time.com and CNN, and then broadcast on an episode of The Colbert Report on Comedy Central. I was mocked as a crazy “reddit conspiracy theorist” who apparently believed the numbers were “cosmically” chosen. Oh, really now? I don’t recall them ever asking.
I couldn’t help but feel bemused that Stephen Colbert had joked about me on national television for engaging in harmless speculation on a silly internet forum. Little did I know the event would foreshadow being called out in Congress in a much graver setting.
At this point, r/conspiracy was becoming large enough to warrant inviting guests for the well-known “Ask Me Anything” (AMA) Q&A sessions that are popular on mainstream reddit. I thought it would be fantastic to host AMAs specifically geared towards those with a conspiratorial bent. The opportunity would soon present itself after I shared some research I was conducting on the American inventor Thomas Townsend Brown, who had discovered and documented an unusual anti-gravitic force using electricity and magnets starting in the 1920’s.
The mystery of Brown’s work for the US Government and his travels around the world culminated in the 1950’s when the then publicly-touted anti-gravity experiments being run by multiple corporations and government agencies went irrevocably black, and to this day have yet to emerge.
A biographer of T. T. Brown, known for his previous work on the equally enigmatic inventor of television, Philo Farnsworth, had abandoned his manuscript and years of work in a dramatic and sudden way. Linda Brown, the only surviving daughter of T. T., believes her father’s biographer was “coerced” into giving up the project after so much time and energy had been invested.
Incredibly, Linda found the research I shared with r/conspiracy about her father. She reached out and we soon developed a budding friendship. It occurred to me that Linda would be the perfect candidate for an AMA, and she agreed. She also asked if I was interested in completing her father’s biography. Flattered, I respectfully declined, as my hands were full with reddit and life. Perhaps I’ll revisit T. T. Brown someday! Here’s Linda’s AMA.
After the success of our first official AMA, I realized the potential for r/conspiracy to give a voice to the marginalized. While the rest of reddit was degenerating into rehashed memes and propaganda, we fiercely maintained our independence and dedication to preserving our space as an open forum. Because our community remained committed to this cause, we were targeted by the rest of reddit, which refused to grant us our independence and insisted we join their obnoxiously redundant conformity.
It began to dawn on me that r/conspiracy’s greatest defense is semantic. It’s well known that there exists a decades-long effort to linguistically discredit uncomfortable truths and deviations from sanctioned narratives as being “conspiracy theories.” This effort is often traced back to the JFK assassination, and this indoctrination has been so effective that it literally warped the definition of the word “conspiracy” itself in the public consciousness. Now merely the word “conspiracy” evokes fanciful nonsense despite the glaring absence of the “theory” modifier to complete the phrase.
This is a type of “spell” (spelling) that’s been cast with language for ages. But over time even the most pernicious semantic spell starts to weaken. So too is the term “conspiracy” quickly reaching that point of semantic satiation. We live in a time when the “conspiracies” are practically writing themselves, and the continued monotonous attempts to dismiss all conspiracies as nonsense is becoming as comical as it is cacophonous.
That being said, throughout the 2010’s, r/conspiracy was consistently the only place on reddit were any theory could be discussed without too much concern of censorship or ridicule. Although we were increasingly ostracized by the rest of reddit, the admins tended to keep a decidedly hands-off approach when it came to managing content on our forum, and initially they rarely would intervene. It was as if the very stigma surrounding the word “conspiracy” gave us more freedom. They would simply dismiss everything we talked about as mere “conspiracy,” an attempt at slander that instead became almost beneficial.
However, coordinated attacks and harassment campaigns from outside r/conspiracy began to steadily increase. Veteran and “controversial” contributors on our forum were given the most negative attention. The harassment was so severe that it would ultimately cause many of our quality members to leave the site completely. The admins did nothing to prevent this documented, coordinated abuse, and they almost assuredly were contributing to it themselves.
Conversely, a new “abrasive” conspiracy theorist was born, and this one was usually aggressively fixated on a small handful of topics, which more often than not were red herrings. They would only appear to proselytize whenever their pet conspiracy was being discussed. For example, I noticed this behavior from a pattern of suspicious accounts concerning the “thermite” theory of 9/11, namely that industrial grade thermite was used to bring down the towers.
As with any disinfo operation, many well-meaning conspiracy theorists will undoubtedly get swept up in the fray, so not every account arguing for the thermite hypothesis was inorganic, but most were. When I discovered that the main proponent of thermite, Steven Jones, was instrumental in the cold fusion cover-up a decade earlier, my suspicions were confirmed.
Instead of exclusively debunking, the shills were increasingly pushing certain explanations for valid conspiracies that were either partially or completely untrue. In addition, if you didn’t agree with their interpretation of the narrative, you weren’t a “real” conspiracy theorist. We saw this phenomenon explode on a global scale with Russiagate. Before Russiagate, I was documenting the shill behavior and used my observations of their chatter and activity to predict events like Sandy Hook and the Boston Bombing. When I became a r/conspiracy mod, I then had access to many more metrics than regular users, and I used that to my advantage when scanning for patterns to predict future events.
Shortly after the success of our first AMA with Linda Brown, and right around when I was noticing that the thermite theory for 9/11 was largely inorganic, r/conspiracy hosted a notorious second AMA with Richard Gage, an engineer who embraces the thermite theory. When the perhaps unexpectedly educated and erudite members of r/conspiracy began holding Gage’s feet to the fire about the improbability of his theory, he abruptly abandoned the Q&A session. Gage would later claim the account was an “impostor” all along, despite considerable evidence to the contrary.
It stands to reason that if the thermite theory was an “officially” sanctioned misdirection, then r/conspiracy would be used to amplify the disinfo to confuse genuine conspiracy theorists and researchers. The Gage debacle also attempted to derail our nascent AMA program, but we continued undeterred and proceeded to be more discerning with our guests.
By 2016 there was a dramatic shift and uptick in shill activity. This was directly correlated with the infamous “Pizzagate” conspiracy theory surrounding the Podesta emails that leaked in March of that year. This shift was mostly with respect to any discussion of elite pedophilia and global child trafficking rings. Before pizzagate, these threads were generally left unperturbed by the narrative managers. It was still too unbelievable in the public’s eye for our discussions to be considered worthy of derailment. In truth, they were considered “fringe” even by most conspiracy theorists.
But with pizzagate breaking into the mainstream, the shill army descended. One arm attacked any user who dared post about pizzagate, and the other inorganically pushed every insane interpretation of pizzagate imaginable to discredit the very valid discussion of global pedophilia and human trafficking rings.
By the end of 2016, the activity I was observing led me to prepare for a Trump upset, but even I was surprised to see it actually materialize. I had initially considered Trump to be a “fall guy” to ensure a Hillary Clinton victory, but the immediate and categorical descent into madness I witnessed as a result of his election was stunning to behold.
The world was flipped on its head when Trump became POTUS. The conspiracy theorists became the true skeptics, while the narrative consumers and the MSM became wide-eyed conspiracy theorists. As of 2021, these roles have yet to revert back. Every single conspiracy theorist began to be lambasted as “Russian agents.” This schizophrenic episode descended practically overnight in a stunningly coordinated fashion.
The traditional conspiracy theorists were being expected to believe the Steele Dossier and similar delusions verbatim. After all, we were conspiracy theorists, right? Aren’t we supposed to believe in all conspiracy theories? Hundreds of thousands of users on our forum were immediately cast as Trump supporters and/or Putin puppets for merely expressing skepticism that the historically corrupt MSM just might be unanimously propagating the same propaganda as before.
And yet, Trump bombed Syria over a literal false flag and the same cancerous MSM lauded him as “presidential” in a surreal moment of rare transparency. I repeatedly criticized Trump for playing the buffoon. While the media erupted in masturbatory ecstasy at the revenue and relevancy generated by his crass irregularities, the criminal US military and corporate juggernaut appeared to churn on, largely unabated.
Despite my regular vocal condemnation of Trump for playing the fool while he continued to drone strike innocent human beings, I started to notice that the narrative managers were at it again: “the r/conspiracy forum has been commandeered by Trump/Putin spies!” The same accounts that had engaged in sustained abuse of our community for years began claiming that we posed a legitimate existential threat. Go figure.
Since the neocons had largely been abandoned for the neolibs as the preferred mechanism of control, they needed to appeal to this woke new breed of malleable minds. The “conspiratard” forum at this point had rebranded itself as “topmindsofreddit” (TMOR), a reference to the “top men” tasked to investigate the Ark of the Covenant in Indiana Jones lore.
Despite having a comparably low number of subscribers, r/topmindsofreddit was routinely featured on the front page of r/all (the most publicly visible and coveted spot on reddit). The vast majority of content featured on TMOR was specifically from the r/conspiracy sub, but they also targeted any forum that didn’t espouse an anti-Trump or far-left political paradigm.
Because reddit was quickly devolving into a self-congratulatory echo chamber, communities like TMOR really took off. They target any user, comment or thread they deem unsavory. They also directly link this “offending” content to their sub, and the same circle jerk cycle churns on with malevolent regularity. Although reddit has traditionally discouraged and disallowed communities from actively linking and participating in threads on other subs, when directed at r/conspiracy and other “inconvenient” spaces this behavior is encouraged and rewarded by the hivemind.
Although I started receiving threats before even becoming a r/conspiracy mod back when I was butting heads with the Monsanto bullies, the volume and severity of this rhetoric that I received in the aftermath of “Russiagate” was simply off the charts. At the height of the Russiagate furor it wasn’t uncommon for me to be sent up to a dozen threats per day, if not more. These came in the form of private messages, custom reports on my threads, and calls for doxxing and violence directed at me on other subreddits like TMOR.
I reported much of this filth to the admins, especially the death threats, but action was rarely taken against the offending accounts. It wasn’t uncommon for the users I reported to receive a brief 3-day suspension, only for them to get right back at it when they returned. It was more common for no action to be taken at all. Threads from many of these narrative management subs that linked to my content would even occasionally reach the front page of reddit. Each time this happened, it would result in more of this behavior. The admins repeatedly allowed this cycle to perpetuate.
The admins couldn’t ban us. The only thing we were doing “wrong” was doubting insane MSM conspiracy theories like Russiagate. So they opted to harass us until we quit. Needless to say, I continued sharing conspiracies and moderating the forum with even more zeal. After all, I had taught myself how to spot disinfo campaigns by observing the patterns on r/conspiracy.
Russiagate was as blatant a psyop as I had yet seen. As with most effective psyops, “Russiagate” undoubtedly contained kernels of truth. The Russian government is not a benevolent actor by any stretch of the imagination. But the vast majority of this phobia was pure nonsense, and the trained conspiracy theorist recognized this immediately. I started spending so much time trying to explain that questioning Russiagate didn’t make you a Trump supporter that I began to think making us waste our breath on this fallacy was part of the plan.
The effect made by pizzagate was somewhat analogous. Although conspiracy theorists had been attempting to shed light on elite pedophilia for years, all of the sudden we became those silly “pizzagaters” for discussing valid topics like the Dutroux Affair, Jimmy Savile and Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein and his “Lolita Express” in particular were hot topics on r/conspiracy for years before the story blew up internationally.
With Russiagate, the conspiracy was aimed at the mainstream instead, while the conspiracy theorists were gaslit to the max with the same tired divisive political false dichotomy. It was baffling how firmly the propaganda had rooted itself. I lost track of the times I was told I was a Trump supporter only to have the conversation abandoned when I requested proof. The “proof” often given was that r/conspiracy was creating a “safe space” for Trump. In actuality, reddit had begun its systematic purge of anything remotely right of center.
Other than r/conspiracy, the one large sub that maintained its independence from the corporate homogenization of reddit was r/the_donald (T_D). T_D was so effective at maintaining its own echo chamber (which it undoubtedly was), that it exposed the hypocrisy of the rest of reddit by routinely reaching the front page of r/all. T_D demonstrated that there were other opinions about Trump that weren’t “orange man bad,” which at the time was the only one sanctioned by reddit.
To deal with these regular deviations from the narrative, the admins at first throttled, and then ultimately banned, T_D and its community of millions of users. It was becoming too powerful of a force. Many of them abandoned reddit completely. The rest of the “deplorables” were consolidated onto a handful of subs such as r/conservative and r/conspiracy. After all, It’s easier to censor and coordinate the harassment of just a couple forums.
Obviously, many of the “refugees” from the T_D ban found their way onto r/conspiracy, which further contributed to the collective tantrum of TMOR and the other narrative managers that r/conspiracy was subservient to Trump. In reality, we were welcoming them in not because of their political beliefs, but simply because they were silenced. Conspiracy theorists traditionally back those who are being censored. We would’ve extended the same welcome had the politics been completely reversed.
The r/conspiracy mod team was well known to consist of a wide range of political beliefs, and we historically have called out both political parties in the US and abroad. The only thing r/conspiracy was “guilty” of was not getting swept up by officially mandated conspiracy theories like Russiagate. Apparently, the same Mockingbird Media that spent decades denying every “inconvenient” conspiracy imaginable suddenly became experts on what constitutes a conspiracy theory worthy of discussion.
I watched in disturbed fascination as violent rhetoric against Trump and Trump supporters littered the front page of r/all. Whenever I had to clean up blatant rule-breaking content on r/conspiracy from brigades originating from elsewhere on reddit, it almost always was from violent and aggressive anti-Trump posters from subs like r/politics. Whenever we removed these personal attacks (clear violations of our rules), the r/conspiracy mods found ourselves being routinely excoriated as “defending” Trump, when we were just doing our job.
When the Nicholas Sandmann debacle hit, I realized that society had reached an horrific turning point. The brainwashed masses showed their true colors when they collectively called for the head of a minor for no tangible reason other than they were told to do so. I watched multiple calls for Sandmann’s beating and death go unmoderated across reddit. Even worse, I was attacked for removing this reprehensible content on my own forum. The degeneracy I witnessed in the 24 hours or so following that disgusting episode was beyond the pale.
I had spent years investigating credible proof of topics like elite pedophilia. I thought I’d seen it all. But the potentially disastrous repercussions I envisioned from the ease in which the state-sponsored two minutes of hate against Sandmann was implemented was an entirely new beast.
The reddit admins were allowing violent threats against a minor to proliferate, and it was up to the moderators of the conspiracy forum on their website to attempt to undo some of the damage. I had no allegiance to Trump and yet I was deeply sickened by this unhinged spectacle. The conspiratorial delusions were continuing in the mainstream media, and the public kept lapping it up at a prodigious rate.
Concomitant with the widespread condoning of violent rhetoric towards Trump and his supports, I noticed a profound uptick in similarly violent rhetoric towards any semblance of a skeptical conversation on vaccines. Having spent over a decade analyzing many tens of thousands of threads of r/conspiracy, I can say with full confidence that no subject elicits more backlash and more of a coordinated shill response than calling into question the vaccine narrative.
In fact, when I started delving into conspiracy theories in the mid-2000’s, the vaccine issue wasn’t even on my radar. I watched Alex Jones rant about vaccines and responded like most people when exposed to Jones: with baffled amusement. It wasn’t until I started receiving unprecedented backlash from the same coterie of shills that aggressively defended Monsanto and the like that I started to have my interest in vaccines piqued.
After all, I was well-versed at analyzing the reaction to certain themes as a gauge for their validity. Don’t get me wrong, this does not mean every topic that attracts “debunkers” must therefore be true, a contrarian viewpoint that’s logically unsound. But if you carefully review the style and method of the debunkers, it can often give you profound clues as to their motives and the overall veracity of the conspiracy theory in question.
The vaccine issue was the big one, and clearly not much has changed. I just happened to notice it earlier than most because the shills gave it away. In addition to continuing with my regular moderator duties, I spent more time and effort investigating the vaccine issue than any other subject. I produced two considerable mega-threads called the Skeptic’s Guide to Vaccines Parts 1 & 2.
I routinely updated r/conspiracy with my observations on the scope of pro-vaccine propaganda that was a daily occurrence for many years on reddit. I explained that this activity wasn’t only inorganic, but it was also increasing at a rate that left essentially all other propaganda efforts in the dust. Here’s one of my many pre-COVID warnings:
“The Pro-Vaccine Propaganda on Reddit Has Reached Unprecedented Levels: Blind, unquestioning subservience to the criminal Medical Cartel is a major aspect of their control grid, and complete trust in vaccines represents one of the pillars of this tyranny.”
It didn’t go unnoticed.
The pandemic narrative is integral to this propaganda effort, as it also amplifies the concerns of the conspiracy theorists themselves. We know they play god with pathogens. We’re aware that monkey “parts” had contaminated the polio vaccines for decades and there was a causal link between this disaster and the current soft tissue cancer epidemic. We know that this same pathogen, SV-40, is a co-carcinogen with asbestos which contaminated J&J baby powder for decades.
We know about the polio vaccine trials in Africa in the 1950’s where the “HIV” epidemic emerged soon after. We know that Bayer and other companies had dumped contaminated blood products resulting in the poisoning of tens of thousands worldwide and the jump-starting of the “AIDS” narrative.
We saw through the pathetic post-9/11 anthrax theater. We’re well-versed on the diseased happenings at Fort Detrick and Plum Island, and their plans for future “dark winters.” After all, the archaic ruling class requires an ever-evolving invisible “enemy” to maintain their ill-gotten hegemony. The phantom “terrorist” was the preferred boogeyman when the neocons were being used while the amorphous “virus” has become the go-to for the neolibs. Either way, they are merely different implementations of the same anti-human tyranny.
The unmatched propaganda effort towards vaccine compliance couldn’t simply be explained away by the machinations of a for-profit pharmaceutical industry, although that undoubtedly was a driving factor. The pro-vaccine propaganda on reddit was unparalleled, and this was on a website that had become a literal tool of propaganda amplification.
You don’t put that much effort into something on that scale to make sure a few Big Pharma conglomerates sell all their measles shots. You do it to condition the public for future events concerning vaccines and pandemics.
This plan started to come into disturbing focus when “ebola” and “zika” were briefly touted in the hysterical MSM news cycle. I had been following Jon Rappoport at the time, an investigative reporter who began his career unraveling the HIV/AIDS deception. Rappoport routinely called out “pandemics” as being attributable to other factors like environmental toxins, pollution, poisonous pharmaceuticals, and medical malpractice.