Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

31
3 Tips for Checking Whether a Medical Study is Legit or Bullshit - tips distilled from decades of reading, writing and editing scientific and medical papers. (off-guardian.org)
posted 4 years ago by clemaneuverers 4 years ago by clemaneuverers +32 / -1
22 comments share
22 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (22)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– DZP1 4 points 4 years ago +5 / -1

This woman's tips are biased and not fully objective but rather subjective.

Tip#1 states that if something like a list of reagents is not published in the paper (but available), it indicates dishonesty. No. sometimes non-essential items are reduced in a paper in order to condense the publishing size and make it a little more physically readable so that the reader does not have to slog through secondary details. And she says putting it in a supplemental doc is burying it. Not so.

Frei constantly pushes her MSc, perhaps to enhance her authority, but really, she's someone who got a degree but couldn't get a research job so she turned to writing - a real come-down.

If anything, Frei seems to be an agent tasked with dispelling claims that the vaccines cause any harm at all. I really get the impression she works for Big Pharma, and may even be paid by a vax mfr.

Oddly, I also get the impression Frei wears really ugly thick glasses and has a smug look all the time.

But it is good to know who pushes agendas and uses sophisticated smear logic such as hers.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid -3 points 4 years ago +1 / -4

This woman's tips are biased and not fully objective but rather subjective.

That's how government funded flat earthers operate. They pretend no evidence is evidence.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DZP1 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

I keep losing track. Which alt are you again?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

Yo momma

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy