Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

47
NASA re-used a Mars surface image from it's CGI demonstration of Perseverance's landing procedure in the "real" footage of the landing, supposedly filmed by Perserverance's onboard cameras. (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 4 years ago by clemaneuverers 4 years ago by clemaneuverers +51 / -4
29 comments download share
29 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
▲ 11 ▼
– clemaneuverers [S] 11 points 4 years ago +11 / -0

The larger, yellowish image is a still from the CGI demonstration. The smaller, pinkish, superimposed image is a still from the "real" landing footage, supposedly captured by a camera on the rover facing down looking at the surface of the planet.

I found this here. In russian, you'll have to use translate. A few pertinent passages:

If we superimpose one frame on top of another, we will notice that the frame of the "real footage" (real descent) is the same computer drawing, only rotated 135 degrees. The same shadows, the same direction of light, the same scale.

Two frames are completely identical - a frame from a cartoon (orange) and a frame from a real video footage "the real footage" (pink).

The descent to Mars itself, filmed with a supposedly real video camera, does not produce the feeling of a real descent, neither at the beginning nor at the end. We see at first, as it were, shooting off a protective heat shield (shield). But the fact that this is computer graphics is unambiguous.

I already foresee that in the morning paid trolls and foreign agents sitting on the salary of the State Department will come running to this topic, who will furiously prove that the computer scientists who made the animation knew exactly where the Perseverance rover would land, and therefore reproduced the landing site using satellite images very accurate. The computer scientists, who started working on this video six months ago, knew the landing site with an accuracy of ten meters and the landing time with an accuracy of a second, so they correctly depicted both the direction of light and the length of the shadows. And the work of the computer scientists coincided perfectly with the "real" filming from Mars!

This is on Earth, when the spacecraft returns from near space (from a height of 350 km), they organize tracking and search operations, because from the late 1960s to the 21st century, the landing accuracy of Soyuz during normal, nominal descent is ± 50-60 km from the calculated point. "And on Mars, American iPhones and iPads work, so with their help there are no problems to land a spacecraft on an unknown planet (200 million kilometers away from us) at a specified point with an accuracy of several meters. And even show it in advance using a computer. graphs of exactly what this place will look like!

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy