I didn't do a 180 because I was already against it for basically the same reasons.
These figures are propped up just because. Everyone knows globalists are into some bad shit. The Q cult will follow anyone who says this, which is insane because it could be anyone. Even the possibility of globalists doing bad things being mentioned by some random gets them to follow that random. Ron Watkins gained a cult following by simpling reading a manual and saying that the system includes adjudication. Of course the system includes adjudication. Elections all have some form of it. Whether that gets absued or not is on the one who can abuse it.
The GameStop thing was not organic at all. I was seeing NPC comments that got stuck in a loop not showing any understanding of what's happening and saying to buy silver. Then silver had a small pump and dump and GME had a big pump and dump. People had no idea why GME was even being bought. Robert Barnes was falsely telling people it was because people like GameStop and wanted to save it from hedge funds because he took his son to the stores when he was younger. I'm always skeptical of things like that.
Not to mention I know a little bit about options since I trade weeklies and there's an option known as a straddle that plays both sides because a trader believes it will move a large magnitude either up or down. So why wouldn't some people shorting it also buy calls if they're expecting a large movement? Why announce shorting it and why would we trust people saying to jump on it? Maybe the hedge fund losing some money was a small sacrifice and the guys who announced shorting it were playing the other side. They know of short squeezes. Why not let another entity take some losses while they realize their gains?
I didn't do a 180 because I was already against it for basically the same reasons.
These figures are propped up just because. Everyone knows globalists are into some bad shit. The Q cult will follow anyone who says this, which is insane because it could be anyone. Even the possibility of globalists doing bad things being mentioned by some random gets them to follow that random. Ron Watkins gained a cult following by simpling reading a manual and saying that the system includes adjudication. Of course the system includes adjudication. Elections all have some form of it. Whether that gets absued or not is on the one who can abuse it.
The GameStop thing was not organic at all. I was seeing NPC comments that got stuck in a loop not showing any understanding of what's happening and saying to buy silver. Then silver had a small pump and dump and GME had a big pump and dump. People had no idea why GME was even being bought. Robert Barnes was falsely telling people it was because people like GameStop and wanted to save it from hedge funds because he took his son to the stores when he was younger. I'm always skeptical of things like that.
Not to mention I know a little bit about options since I trade weeklies and there's an option known as a straddle that plays both sides because a trader believes it will move a large magnitude either up or down. So why wouldn't some people shorting it also buy calls if they're expecting a large movement? Why announce shorting it and why would we trust people saying to jump on it? Maybe the hedge fund losing some money was a small sacrifice and the guys who announced shorting it were playing the other side. They know of short squeezes. Why not let another entity take some losses while they realize their gains?