?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (28)
sorted by:
?
Darwin can't explain human traits. Finchs, sure. There's no "evolutionary advantage" to Spina bifida. Not everything is mutation.
People with Negative rhesus factor prove the "out of Africa" theory is complete bullshit.
You've been brainwashed by mainstream schooling
http://www.renegadetribune.com/legacy-fallen-race/
https://youtu.be/FEM-80qPJHo
You say "prevailing" but what you meant was "politically correct"
Well, no. Muhammad had red hair, as the arabs emulate. There are Africans endemic to Africa who are white with blue eyes. The Inu of Japan. Ghengis Khan was also white. The early depictions of buddha all show him with blue eyes, extremely rare among the east asian haplogroup. I had a recent post in which is claimed the Vedas had to be written in the arctic.
So is Siberia, if that's how your logic works. Look at these indigenous japanese people
https://weirdnews.info/2020/05/24/what-race-are-the-ainu-people-of-japan/
We could go on forever about most japanese currently are from one clan, basically the female ghengis Khan of Japan, forgot her name. Irregardless, there are indigenous whites from Africa to the far far east. "Prevailing" archeology is more of a tug of war between facts and politics or dogma, in my estimation.
But then again I'm just some asshole who tries to listen to people who know what they're talking about
I don't know how you got that from the video. Basically all European royalty are cromagnon with negative rhesus factor. There was a high antideluvian civilation which the caucazoid haplogroup is supected of being the remnants of.
That this civilization branched out to mix with homosapiens across the globe is allegorical to naohs sons. We're interbred, not segregated. Again, I don't know where you get this notion.