There's a difference between, for the sake of equality sticking a token woman in a job she can't do versus hiring a woman who's qualified to do a job. The first one is wrong, the second is not. If someone thinks that all women are incapable of leadership roles simply because they are women, then theyre just a misogynistic piece of shit who is incapable of logical thinking.
To put it another way, let's look at firefighters. They have to pass a physical requirements test in order to become firefighters. They have to be able to lift a limp human out of a burning building and haul them to safety. A lot of women aren't capable of doing this because women tend to have less physical strength then men because biology. But if Big Bertha can pass the same physical requirements as the male prospects, she has every right to be a firefighter and there's zero logical reason why she shouldn't be. I absolutely would not approve of a woman who couldn't pass the strength tests to be a firefighter.
This is justified and logical. Anyone who makes the "Women all vote liberal and have their periods and are too emotional and hysterical to make rational decisions ever so they should all just shut up and not vote and just be teachers or caregivers" arguments is a drooling smooth brain.
Yeah using the "we've been doing it for thousands of years" argument is nonsensical. Our ancestors thought the earth was flat and we could cure diseases by sticking leeches on people. Just because it was done in* the past doesn't mean it's the best practice.
Men are equipped for war? Did you not read anything I wrote? If a woman can do the job the same as a man then your point here is invalid. Read the text.
Your only arguments for your viewpoints are: 1. This is the way its always been done therefore it's right. 2. Regardless of whether or not a female can perform the same as a man, Men are just better because reasons.
Lmfao ??
You're still using the same appeal to tradition fallacy to support your argument and it's still invalid, lol. I don't anticipate that I'll get any kind of intelligent response from you on the subject because your argument is based in your imaginary sense of male superiority.
There's a difference between, for the sake of equality sticking a token woman in a job she can't do versus hiring a woman who's qualified to do a job. The first one is wrong, the second is not. If someone thinks that all women are incapable of leadership roles simply because they are women, then theyre just a misogynistic piece of shit who is incapable of logical thinking. To put it another way, let's look at firefighters. They have to pass a physical requirements test in order to become firefighters. They have to be able to lift a limp human out of a burning building and haul them to safety. A lot of women aren't capable of doing this because women tend to have less physical strength then men because biology. But if Big Bertha can pass the same physical requirements as the male prospects, she has every right to be a firefighter and there's zero logical reason why she shouldn't be. I absolutely would not approve of a woman who couldn't pass the strength tests to be a firefighter. This is justified and logical. Anyone who makes the "Women all vote liberal and have their periods and are too emotional and hysterical to make rational decisions ever so they should all just shut up and not vote and just be teachers or caregivers" arguments is a drooling smooth brain.
Yeah using the "we've been doing it for thousands of years" argument is nonsensical. Our ancestors thought the earth was flat and we could cure diseases by sticking leeches on people. Just because it was done in* the past doesn't mean it's the best practice. Men are equipped for war? Did you not read anything I wrote? If a woman can do the job the same as a man then your point here is invalid. Read the text. Your only arguments for your viewpoints are: 1. This is the way its always been done therefore it's right. 2. Regardless of whether or not a female can perform the same as a man, Men are just better because reasons. Lmfao ??
You're still using the same appeal to tradition fallacy to support your argument and it's still invalid, lol. I don't anticipate that I'll get any kind of intelligent response from you on the subject because your argument is based in your imaginary sense of male superiority.