Judges at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) have apparently been influenced (meaning bought) by NGOs controlled by Bill Gates & George Soros according to a new Report by the European Center for Law & Justice:
https://eclj.org/geopolitics/echr/conflits-d-interets-entre-juges-et-ong
Full report here:
https://eclj.org/ngos-and-the-judges-of-the-echr?lng=en
The article states:
"Well-known and controversial US billionaire George Soros with his Open Society Foundation and Microsoft, a company founded by Bill Gates, are two of the largest donors to the European Court of Human Rights."
"Our report makes proposals... greater attention should be paid to the choice of candidates for the post of judge by avoiding the appointment of ACTIVISTS and CAMPAIGNERS."
Most judges on the Court are not legal professionals!
Nor withstanding your information I must admit that I was surprised someone pushed that case through, because it was either 1) too stupid or 2) pre-planned (controlled opposition) to set a precedent.
You know how vaccination has been widely accepted in different sectors of society so far (whether you like it or not)?
There you have it. Case closed. That is what the ECHR said in brief.
The case to win is elsewhere...
Three steps back...
Hierarchically what should be challenged are the following in order of priority...
Why can't people understand this basic thinking?