200 Proofs the earth is not a spinning ball. Free Ebook PDF
(docs.google.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XEy2jh7Z-o
Correct. It isn't trully flat.Differences are hard to spot but are real.
Mostly wrong.,ask somebody who studied geodesy. In fact they are studying hyperbolic geometry too. Of course the difference is small, just 1 degree per 111,2 km so sometimes is easier is to not include this corrections in most cases. less than difference hair for a mile is not so big thing.
Escape speed is much higher than 500 mph.
why satellites and space fall to atmosphere after long time ? Flat-earthers are imbeciles not understanding basic physics. Centripetal force you fools.
Again prove flath-earthers not know physics. Helicopters and hot-air baloons are moving with atmosphere. However those idea of travelling wouldn't be so stupid if you would leave atmosphere and wait indeed.It is currently just not affordable only as achieving escape speed require much more fuel.
Learn the physics and do the math flat-earth imbeciles...
Again physic,physics,physics. Atmospheric refraction.
I don't fucking care to debunk whole those flat-earth idiocy,but it is really funny to point some of it.
It isn't about cold,it is about earth magnetic field and space radiation what would interfere with navigation both in Antarctica and Arctica. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRFrnWq3OBZM89w_IoiNIQ3lxRENBjvSNRgubfX5_4kWSV3ZNx9eVAV1tObxgnj3HHmAms&usqp=CAU Moreover: nowhere to land if something gets wrong.
Things about planes - they travel mostly over land. Traveling over see is not good - nowhere to land if something will fail.Most flights are done over land because of that. Or on routes where you can turn to land area and land on it.
Also - it is about money and infrastructure. For example: Why Santiago to Sidney not trough new Zealand ? https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/south-american-airline-latam-pulls-back-from-new-zealand-as-it-overflies-auckland/VQELIDMAV6ZDCREJKJRGYNFH2U/
Planes have to be refuelled.
Again no even basic understanding of physics. Both attract themselves,but are also rotating. Centrifugal force opposes here gravity.
But explaining something than somebody don't like to have explained has no sense... However it is good lolcontent and good prove how uneducated and not knowing basic physics are flat-earthers.
You don't seem to understand, the pilot would still have to be pointing the nose slightly down to avoid gaining altitude. A plane is not curved to suit the curvature of the earth. It's funny you try so hard but your arguments are paper thin and based on lies. I could go through every single point you've made and destroy it. I wouldn't be having this argument if it was so easily debunked.
No,you not understand basic physics you ignorant. It is same like with problem of cannon shot:
The thing is: plane moves in and with atmosphere during earth rotation. It is like going in bus or riding in car. You feel force if bus/cars slows or fastens.Only then.
If bus or car would neither fastens or slows you would can feel nothing. because Force = mass * acceleration (second Newton's law of motion)
According to first Newton's law:
So If earth move with constant speed you - being on earth - cannot differ it from earth not moving.
So:
1st: Curvature of earth is too small to be noticeable on those plane even if it would be curved XD - it isn't of course because it don't need it.
Second thing is physics you don't know. Do you even know why satellites not fall on earth ? https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-47b3736d882ae905ca2db1e0f78a888d.webp like on a string
In case of plane there is also difference of pressures over and bellow wings,but without trust it would fall like a stone.
Me say you not knowy english very good.
I bet NASA told you they fall all the time for these reasons. You're being gullible they literally create a math equation to support every lie. Hubble does not exist, it is project sophia which is a boeing 747 modified.
Again, they literally make up math to support their lies. I can create math equations to support the earth is a triangle pyramid and it will make logical sense.
That's just bullshit. They can fly across the Pacific ocean fine but can't fly over a pole lmao. Should research gyroscopes they are 100% mechanical nothing to do electronic, and they function with or without a curve and maintain their level.
Give me a NASA budget and consider it done
Oh you are right I am not english native speaker.Sorry.So ?
Try XD If you know math so well like you know physics it would be funny.
Modern plane navigation and other things are more complicated than "hey,you shall have some gyroscope" XD Modern plane have so much electronics that if not meet some storm nor any crisis situation pilots are needed mostly to start and land.
You would literally shit yourself if you would have to understand how to land, understanding completely avionic is maybe even beyond my capabilities man. Modern plane contains huuge boxes of electronics,risking some bit will flip (you probably not know even what I am talking about) might be deadly.
Yeah no they still use mechanical gyroscopes. There is no true electronic gyroscopes they all malfunction during free fall but a mechanical one does not. You should go dig really hard into this because it is the truth.