This is the perfect thread to discuss something like voting rights. Imagine if I posted something like, "what constitutes good voting rights?" You wouldnt even be here if I didnt post something spicy or edgy, and you know it.
I think theres a fundamental disconnect going on between the Republican women and Republican men. And it concerns agreeableness. Women are more agreeable, so they tend to avoid ideas that are not considered mainstream.
I (and the pollsters and politicians) find the most reliable way to engage women in siding with the Constitution/"topics where they risk disagreements" is for them to have male children, or at least children. That puts a woman's skin in the game. For a lot of women, her husband is always someone who can be jettisoned if it became a necessity. But 99% of females would never do that to their own children. And as long as they can be focused on Our Posterity, we can get them to stand up for said Posterity, and be willing to risk disagreements/icky conversations.
Thats a good point, as during the Covid pandemic, 88% of women would stick with CDC guidelines (wearing a mask when required, social distancing, etc) with one notable exception...when it came to school closures. Womens agreement with closing schools because of covid was at about 33%.
In other words, they didnt care about any of the other parts (no enough to confront people about it) unless their children were impacted.
One of the key takeaways from the Stanley Milgram Experiments, for me, is that the data shows clearly that women are better bootlicker/stormtroopers than men. They are more submissive, and therefore more adherent to commands.
But when it comes to their children, it's different.
This is the perfect thread to discuss something like voting rights. Imagine if I posted something like, "what constitutes good voting rights?" You wouldnt even be here if I didnt post something spicy or edgy, and you know it.
I think theres a fundamental disconnect going on between the Republican women and Republican men. And it concerns agreeableness. Women are more agreeable, so they tend to avoid ideas that are not considered mainstream.
I (and the pollsters and politicians) find the most reliable way to engage women in siding with the Constitution/"topics where they risk disagreements" is for them to have male children, or at least children. That puts a woman's skin in the game. For a lot of women, her husband is always someone who can be jettisoned if it became a necessity. But 99% of females would never do that to their own children. And as long as they can be focused on Our Posterity, we can get them to stand up for said Posterity, and be willing to risk disagreements/icky conversations.
Thats a good point, as during the Covid pandemic, 88% of women would stick with CDC guidelines (wearing a mask when required, social distancing, etc) with one notable exception...when it came to school closures. Womens agreement with closing schools because of covid was at about 33%.
In other words, they didnt care about any of the other parts (no enough to confront people about it) unless their children were impacted.
Correct.
One of the key takeaways from the Stanley Milgram Experiments, for me, is that the data shows clearly that women are better bootlicker/stormtroopers than men. They are more submissive, and therefore more adherent to commands.
But when it comes to their children, it's different.