A lie so big you can't accept.
(www.bitchute.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
The flight times of airline travel. The way the moon and seasons work. The percentage of humans who would have to be in on it.
The absolute refusal of every flatter I've encountered to engage with the coherent points made in video form by "professor dave". It's been a solid 12 to 15 actual flatters, many in extended exchanges.
Rather than jumping at the chance to destroy ball earth theory, every single one has backed away from their chance to demonstrate that the ball earth arguments are weak and invalid.
I know we both know you're trolling (or paid shilling?), but it amuses me to give flatters a chance. :)
The flight times of airline travel... That's the easiest to debunk. Consider there are no one way flights from Africa to Australia. Or from south america to Australia..or new zealand to south america. Or from new zealand to africa. Or from Africa to south america. Makes no sense on a globe.. makes perfect sense on a flat earth map. Look https://www.bitchute.com/video/CzW4sdQMyTGz/
I'll watch that video, despite the danger of being converted to a flatter. :o
Not trolling or paid shilling. Go ahead and give me a proposal to debunk though. I'm not watching anymore debunking videos they're all propaganda in my eyes at this point. But if you have something particular you would like explained go ahead and mention it. It's not that everyone is in on it, it's that most people involved are not even aware/they're compartmentalized intentionally so they they do not even know. So please, what points would you like explained?
I'm pecking with one finger for awhile, so can't do a whole text rebuttal. Take any one of those videos and just point out where he goes wrong, as he 'claims to do' with flat earth. It should be easy?
Okay. First statement made in the video with drumroll.
There's tons of money to be gained. There's potential mass resources in antarctica to gain. Putting on the space farce allows a bread and circus spectacle while the military industrial complex builds their own underground bunkers, send our military into Vietnam, Korea, Cambodia, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc etc etc.. Plenty to be gained on that conquest there.
I finished watching to the end, and you're not likely to be happy [with the rest]. He goes pretty hard there, and there's not much room for rebuttal.
Ha, then I watched the next one up debunking a guy I've been watching sometimes, and oof.
I wrote that off more as his hyperbolic douchey style, but sure, a secret infinite flat plane would be valuable.
Note that I think his previous science based arguments are technically stronger. But focusing on the numbers of people who would have to be 'in on it' is an interesting approach. It's not 'proof', but it stretches the credibility pretty far.
I'm going to try to watch that one again to see it from your perspective.
Just rewatched that section through 3:25. Potential resources in the flat plane would seem unlikely to justify the trillions of $$$ spent on the vastly expensive lie.
Maybe to hide God? Somewhat more plausible if you accept that Satan has dominion over the earth, but even there I'm not really seeing the payoff justifying the expense. Although most 'claim' to believe in god, they don't really. That might blow up in major way if the whole 'firmament' thing were proved reality.
I might give you a point if you go with the god argument.