Because you are being obtuse and asking for a cross examination, get a clue re-re this is some corroborative evidence of what he has claimed and he addressed the issues you brought up in the first few pages, maybe not in depth enough to your satisfaction but he did acknowledge them with at least a rudimentary reasonability. Act smug all you want, doesnt make you correct in dismissing this because your very specific questions werent answered exhaustively, it just proves your "intellectual curiosity" is as much a ruse as the rest of you.