When you're attempting to advance extraordinary claims, the burden of proof is on you to prove it. It is not on your audience to disprove it. For example, when you say something like "Hunter Biden is a pedophile" then the burden would be on you to show that there is reasonable cause to believe such a thing. This is a classic bad faith technique rooted in that same "x is true, change my mind" gimmick that the moron Steven Crowder has popularized.
A lot of you seem to have great difficulty understanding how this works. Thank me later.
Hilariously ironic coming from you.
That's not the purpose of a conspiracy forum. This is not a courtroom. A conspiracy forum is a place where people ask "what if this is connected to this". A conspiracy forum is a place for brainstorming and free speech, not for definitive proof and debunking. The burden of proof on a conspiracy forum is literally whatever circumstantial evidence or chain of reasoning leads a poster to theorize on a potential conspiracy.
Do you fuck kids? I think you're a pedophile. Prove me wrong.