JUST IN - U.S. Supreme Court REFUSES to review Pennsylvania election cases. No standing before an election, moot after. Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissent from the denial. Since it only takes 4 justices to hear a case, they were only one vote away from getting a full hearing. - Conspiracies

JUST IN - U.S. Supreme Court REFUSES to review Pennsylvania election cases. No standing before an election, moot after. Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissent from the denial. Since it only takes 4 justices to hear a case, they were only one vote away from getting a full hearing. (nitter.cc)

posted 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl +42 / -1

13 comments

13 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (13)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– AnonymousFrog 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

They could have ruled on whether the procedures were legal. There are other elections. The idea that these scumbags can drag their feet, then say it’s moot is unacceptable. And fraud should void the election. As they say, the Constitution isn’t a suicide pact. They could leave it to other branches of government to solve, but to let this linger is outrageous.

permalink parent save report block reply