So, I want to contribute to the public consultation about the necessity of digital identities as presented by the UK government.
Can we all squeeze our ridge brains and come up with arguments against the necessity of digital identities please?
It is given that the government(s) as a given has covered the areas of privacy/data protection, fraud, inclusivity of services and security therefore more (or stronger on the previous ones) arguments are required.
Please let's all come together to make a solid argument against the need of digital identities.
Here's the porposal if interested to read the arguments for https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework/the-uk-digital-identity-and-attributes-trust-framework
We have until 12pm on Thursday 11 March 2021
I do not think I got my point across. I fully understand and agree with your point but...
They do not dispute the use of ID's.
They are asking (pretending to) about a public's perspective.
I know they do not give a shit but...
It is better to respond rather than not...
So I am looking for arguments to counteract their arguments, not the principle which is (unfortunately) accepted as is.
I am asking for your help as I cannot think of any arguments. rather than give up i reached out to my best buddies; YOU.
If the entire community in conspiracies.win (so many spend so much time here arguing)** cannot come up with some solid arguments it means that we are (myself included) incompetent **to counteract any of their measures and our demise simply a matter of time.