Raising cattle is actually the worst possible use of resources and red meat causes cancer. Your best bet is chicken and turkey. They use less feed, produce less waste, take up less space, and have the best nutrients for calories ratios. Bodybuilders mostly eat chicken, rice and veggies.
The environmental impact of grass fed beef is about the same as the impact of chicken and turkey per pound of meat. It's factory farmed beef that's much worse. And grass fed beef is more nutritious than factory farmed beef.
No it's not at all. Cattle require way more feed which also requires more farmland to grow, produce more waste that runs-off into the water supply and produces methane, and require an insane amount of water. Cows have the WORST feed conversion ratios by far. Also, the FDA term for grass-fed is meaningless. It's basically an idiot tax. Unless you are raising your own cattle, you're consuming factory farmed, pharmaceutical-laden, cancer causing meat. Let's not forget that Big Ag lobbies the government with bullshit the same as Big Pharma.
Did you miss that grass-fed literally means nothing? Let's pretend for a minute for the cows would actually roam around and eat grass when the label "grass-fed" is used (they won't as the industry is free to apply whatever meaning they want), they're just using grass instead of feed, all of the same arguments still apply. Changing the word 'feed' to 'grass' doesn't just make everything magically disappear. Grass-feeding would actually use more water and more acreage. All of this is easily verifiable with a quick internet search so, sorry, but I'm not going to sit around and argue common knowledge.
You don't read much, I reckon.
I literally said "unless you're raising your own cattle..."
If you take your head out of your ass and actually read what I typed, I said that anything store-bought and labeled "grass-fed" is not actually grass-fed because the FDA doesn't actually require the animals to be grass-fed in order to approve the label. The only beef you could be certain is actual grass-fed is cattle you raise yourself.
So he becomes the largest farmland owner and then wants to feed us all synthetic beef. He's not a farmer, he's not a doctor, and he's not even a climate scientist... He is a sadist who we need to kick out like India did years ago.
I doubt the extra energy needed to create synthetic beef is as good for the environment as naturally grazing cattle so they can replenish the soil.
It's great for ol creepos pocketbook though
Raising cattle is actually the worst possible use of resources and red meat causes cancer. Your best bet is chicken and turkey. They use less feed, produce less waste, take up less space, and have the best nutrients for calories ratios. Bodybuilders mostly eat chicken, rice and veggies.
The environmental impact of grass fed beef is about the same as the impact of chicken and turkey per pound of meat. It's factory farmed beef that's much worse. And grass fed beef is more nutritious than factory farmed beef.
No it's not at all. Cattle require way more feed which also requires more farmland to grow, produce more waste that runs-off into the water supply and produces methane, and require an insane amount of water. Cows have the WORST feed conversion ratios by far. Also, the FDA term for grass-fed is meaningless. It's basically an idiot tax. Unless you are raising your own cattle, you're consuming factory farmed, pharmaceutical-laden, cancer causing meat. Let's not forget that Big Ag lobbies the government with bullshit the same as Big Pharma.
Did you miss "grass fed"?
Did you miss that grass-fed literally means nothing? Let's pretend for a minute for the cows would actually roam around and eat grass when the label "grass-fed" is used (they won't as the industry is free to apply whatever meaning they want), they're just using grass instead of feed, all of the same arguments still apply. Changing the word 'feed' to 'grass' doesn't just make everything magically disappear. Grass-feeding would actually use more water and more acreage. All of this is easily verifiable with a quick internet search so, sorry, but I'm not going to sit around and argue common knowledge.
You realize cows litterly roam around and eat grass.
You dont ranch much I reckon.
You don't read much, I reckon. I literally said "unless you're raising your own cattle..." If you take your head out of your ass and actually read what I typed, I said that anything store-bought and labeled "grass-fed" is not actually grass-fed because the FDA doesn't actually require the animals to be grass-fed in order to approve the label. The only beef you could be certain is actual grass-fed is cattle you raise yourself.
So he becomes the largest farmland owner and then wants to feed us all synthetic beef. He's not a farmer, he's not a doctor, and he's not even a climate scientist... He is a sadist who we need to kick out like India did years ago.
Why Bill Gates Is Betting Millions On Synthetic Biology
Businessman tries to get people to consume his product.
Nah.he is buying the law to make you buy his product.
What law are you talking about?
Gates bought over 250,000 acres of Farmland in the US in 2020. Making him one of the single largest Farmland owners in the US.
Let that shit sink in.......