Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

33
Eric Swalwell presented evidence in the impeachment trial of Trump that was modified. Jennifer Lynn Lawrence doesn’t have a verified Twitter account and never had. The blue checkmark was reportedly added. (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 4 years ago by clemaneuverers 4 years ago by clemaneuverers +33 / -0
6 comments download share
6 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
Comments (6)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– clemaneuverers [S] 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

Knowingly presenting doctored evidence in trial is a federal crime, and a pretty big one at that, no?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Graphenium 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

Unfortunately “an impeachment is not a trial and the standards for evidence are far lower” did you see the shit show towards the very end yesterday where Mike Lee tried to get the dems to strike an outright fabricated statement that they attributed to him, and the chodes tried to say he had no right to challenge it?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– clemaneuverers [S] 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

I’ve never been verified on Twitter so why did my Tweet used in the fact-free impeachment include a verification badge? I’m assuming Democrats faked it like they are faking the whole case. @RepSwalwell why did you add a verified badge to my tweet in your presentation?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– goldkeyboardwarrior 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

We don’t even have to act like it was only “allegedly” added, we can literally look at her account today and see there is no checkmark. I know that Twitter sometimes “unverifies” someone (they did it to Farrakhan after he tweeted something to controversial even for them, but they didn’t ban him outright), but internet archives make it too easy to look back and see that she was never verified, and Swalwell probably had his staff add the checkmark to make the exchange seem more credible.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– MAGAmagaEDKH 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

Of course he lies, he shit himself on national television and then denied it when faced with video evidence.....that we ALL saw AND HEARD!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– WindyJibbz 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Calvary vs cavalry.

Cavalry - troops

Calvary - intense mental suffering

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - nxltw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy