Why are the "ruling elite families" called Reptiles ?
Perhaps, because the old bloodlines, who are also known as the 13 families, have strictly adhered to breeding only amongst themselves over the centuries,
their DNA and genetics have failed to evolve and develop,
they are locked into an evolutionary state that existed thousands of years ago.
meanwhile the rest of Humankind has bred and intermingled with a result of superior genetics, built by nature itself.
It may also explain why they are commonly known as reptiles.
All humans have an area of the brain known as the reptilian brain
In some humans, especially the ancient intact bloodlines, this area of the brain did not evolve as the majority of human brains did, because they always breed with their own bloodlines and one result is that they have over developed reptilian brain areas.
It's only a theory, based in part on the concept of the Triune Brain Region.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triune_brain
The reptilian complex (also known as the "R-complex", "reptilian brain" or "lizard brain") was the name MacLean gave to the basal ganglia, structures derived from the floor of the forebrain during development. The term derives from the idea that comparative neuroanatomists once believed that the forebrains of reptiles and birds were dominated by these structures. MacLean proposed that the reptilian complex was responsible for
species-typical instinctual behaviours involved in aggression, dominance, territoriality, and ritual displays.
which may also explain their inhuman behaviour.
Here's a Rabbi explaining that Abel and Cain were the offspring of Eve and the serpent, making them the first reptillians. Food for thought.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJwRsFA4DbU&t=199s&ab_channel=RabbiAlonAnava
Very nice interpretation of Reptilianism from a Paleolithic Deep State perspective. Sums it up really well without using "holographic shapeshifting" and that kind of stuff. Much more plausible than the classic Reptilian theories.
You should cite all these studies saying that psychopathy and other "dark" traits are more prevalent at the top.
these are specialities that are not my area of expertise, I dive down rabbit holes along with a couple of Jack Russells.
FUCK YOU SPAMMER
THIS is exactly how all of our favourite shills are recruited.
we get flooded with the gullible
chasing down 4000 in three days
and never making it
The reptile part of your brain, is a description used even by Psychiatrists. How do I know this? My sister is a Psychiatrist. She often falsely accuses me of only using the reptilian part of my brain.
It's an interesting direction for much further research..
We all know that our collective history has been destroyed, corrupted or hidden.
These just happen to be the same people who are doing it.
Including the truth about their own history.
i look forward to the time in the near future. We can all openly explore this large curiosity. Our standards for Entertainment value are going to be destroyed for the next 5 years. There will never be a Q sequel. But you could Entertain with well written Q prequels.
Look at Jen Psaki's hand and tell me she doesn't have scales.
These families also train their children to be psychopaths.
Therefore, even if genetics were removed, the training would be enough.
the seeds come from the male the female contribute the eggs.
but yes, this is something to do with the serpent and Eve
Awesome theory. Thanks for the post.
question: wouldn’t their offspring end up deformed and retarded? I’ve seen documentaries and it doesn’t take very many generations before you see drastic negative effects.
Cheers
Not at all a specialist in genetics or biology, but have had some schooling in those subjects. It’s true that there could be some defects from overly insular breeding (especially more directly incestuous relationships). This is because it enhances the probability of an offspring being homozygous dominant for a disease carrying allele (like hemophilia). Basically, insular breeding makes problematic traits in the gene pool more likely to be expressed. That being said, from what I’ve read, some now think the dangers of this might have been overstated a bit. Even though that kind of strict adherence to bloodlines opens up the risk for defects, it doesn’t inevitably lead to defects.
There’s definitely been some medical problems you can point to with royals and aristocrats, but overall most don’t have major health problems that I’m aware of. But they may have some other problems like the OP is pointing out.
I think it’s a really interesting theory. He might be on to something.
Thanks for such an informative reply.