Is this a joke -_-
(www.courtlistener.com)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
After looking through a couple handfuls of these court documents, everything important is redacted. There was a lot of leading questions asked about Mar a largo. The only people named came out in support of trump.
There is absolutely no reason anything in these documents should be redacted. Redactions are for national security. There is no way national security is threatened by outing pedophiles.
im really trying my best to grow up but its difficult when im told over and over, by the powers that be, that im a child...
that i cant handle certain shit... and i should be coddled instead.
apparently, im fragile.
Well, that's just a bunch of black pages, innit?
if you print that, thats damn near a coloring book.
Where did you find the documents? I didnt see them here https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17318376/united-states-v-maxwell/
last entry says they had a request to redact documents and they would release them by today i think?
Which court case is this for?
Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433)