Im very very skeptical of her. Aligned with the WEF, just like eyepatch Crenshaw.
Like the Good Book says, be wary of ear-tickling.
The people that seem to make the most sense and speak our publicly are hardly ever in positions to do anything about it. She could be there to make the dems seem less deranged with scripted talking points to keep moderate voters in play.
I dunno. The twitter meltdown happening in the replies to her statement warms my heart. She may be a politician, but she's far less of a politician than the rest.
You don’t have to be on the same side politically to like someone. Like I said, I couldn’t vote for her because of a lot of her socialist tendencies.
This WEF red herring that the anti Tulsi people throw around appears to have no substance. She was voted in as an honorary member because she was an up and coming young politician. I have googled it before and could find no real smoking gun besides the ones I am already aware of.
I do know that the same entities that attack Trump and myself are the same entities that attack Tulsi. Example of this is the OP’s article.
Maybe I should have used the phrase “deep state” instead of globalist. There are a lot of naive but well intentioned people out there that think that globalism would work.
The female Crenshaw
Im very very skeptical of her. Aligned with the WEF, just like eyepatch Crenshaw.
Like the Good Book says, be wary of ear-tickling.
The people that seem to make the most sense and speak our publicly are hardly ever in positions to do anything about it. She could be there to make the dems seem less deranged with scripted talking points to keep moderate voters in play.
But Im blackpilled so don't mind me.
I dunno. The twitter meltdown happening in the replies to her statement warms my heart. She may be a politician, but she's far less of a politician than the rest.
That does put a smile on my face
You don’t have to be on the same side politically to like someone. Like I said, I couldn’t vote for her because of a lot of her socialist tendencies.
This WEF red herring that the anti Tulsi people throw around appears to have no substance. She was voted in as an honorary member because she was an up and coming young politician. I have googled it before and could find no real smoking gun besides the ones I am already aware of.
I do know that the same entities that attack Trump and myself are the same entities that attack Tulsi. Example of this is the OP’s article.
Maybe I should have used the phrase “deep state” instead of globalist. There are a lot of naive but well intentioned people out there that think that globalism would work.
I like Tulsi.
I knew I could flush you out as a deep state shill.