35
()
posted ago by TlKr ago by TlKr +38 / -3
Comments (4)
sorted by:
4
2020_Vision 4 points ago +4 / -0

Raising the status of women "Above all else" -> more proof on the attack of men and the nuclear family as part of our planned downfall.

-2
Dondondondon420 -2 points ago +1 / -3

What’s wrong with having women work and being raised politically?

4
Tarrock 4 points ago +5 / -1

There's two types of job markets; an employee's market, and an employer's market. Your grandparents could raise a huge family and buy a house with 1 parent working because it was an employee's market. When Companies have to fight to get workers, they have to raise wages and create incentives like Pensions in order to hire the best talent.

When you double the work force by putting women in it without doubling the number of jobs, then you create an employer's market, where people have to compeete with MANY other candidates for a simple job, which means they don't have to offer up as much to attract talent since people will work for scraps since demand is higher than supply. Wages get slashed and longer term benefits like pensions no longer exist.

Also, when you get women in government, they start voting for welfare and other feel good programs. The family unit breaks down because people start seeing the government as a protector due to the money. Go look up the play Assembly Women from the ancient greeks.

In 392 BC, the Greek playwright Aristophanes wrote a play called "Ekklesiazousai" which translates to "The Assembly Woman". The play was created for two purposes 1) To make fun of the current congress saying that women would be more efficient than them by enacting a radical agenda, 2)To show what happens when women get power. The ancient Greeks knew back then that giving women power leads to massive welfare, sexual liberation, and other communist ideas.

-2
Dondondondon420 -2 points ago +1 / -3

I think you’re exaggerating a bit