-
there exists an organized effort reaching back far into history to ritualistically scapegoat and murder large amounts of people. Who is performing the ritual? If I had to put a name to it I would chose synagogue of satan but there are many names. The point is a small group of people being scapegoated and turned over for murder by an even smaller group living within them as a parasite and using them as a human (red)shield
-
some mean racists back in 1600s russia were REALLY good at guessing the future. Edit: some current research places the date in the early 1900s, but my point largely stands
Thoughts? If you think something else, my mind is open but please let’s keep the discussion within polite bounds if we can.
Waters Flowing Eastward by Leslie Fry:
https://files.catbox.moe/0eixvr.pdf
I found this to be an excellent book, that has an extensive part on the origin of the Protocols. It was written in the 30's I think, before the mass misnfo campaign had time to dry. Also good is Kerry Bolton's document on the topic:
https://files.catbox.moe/rb5ltt.pdf
An overview of the Protocols historical conext, comparing and contrasting the various origin stories, and ultimately narrowing it down largley to L. Fry's description in Water Flowing Eastward.
And then recently I came accross this document seemingly arguing for a Ukranian origin of the Protocols:
https://files.catbox.moe/31uo5s.pdf
By Karl Radl: The Protocols of Zion: The Facts, Myths and the Lies. I've yet to read it but I'm a little skeptical since it's the only study I've seen of it's kind. But it looks well written and is on my reading list.
Regardless of the exact scenario, they are a real document (or were translated from a real document – the actual original was returned to the archive in Paris from which it was "borrowed", after translation to Russian) and were developed over time seemingly by various groups - Jewish FreeMasons/Kabalists / Synagog of Satan / Sabbatean Frankist-type people. Fry reckons she knew who the original author was. The name escapes me. It's in her book (first link).
Ahh my mistake, I didn’t refresh myself on the various sides of the debate before posting this and for some reason remembered a far earlier attribution. But like you mention it seems the debate is still ongoing so that could explain my out of date info!
Thanks for this post, real historical scholarship is hugely important, lest we forget and repeat the cycle poorly
I spent a bit of time early last year trying to unearth the "anti-wikipedia" origin of the protocols (i.e. the true origin), and upon consultation with various knowledgeable anons, I narrowed the field of possibility down to info contained in those 3 documents I linked.
The first 2 agree with each other, and the third throws in a curve ball, but does not question the veracity of the protocols; just that the origin is ultimately Ukraine and not Paris, France.
Similar groups of people are implicated in both scenarios.