*based on evidence that was to be presented in a bunch of court cases that failed because the judges refused to hear them for one bullshit reason or another.
The difference there is that if you ran that trial 60 times with different people involved in the process, he would have been convicted probably many many times.
"Possible illegal votes" based on a bunch of failed court cases. I, for one, am enjoying this show. I like farces. ????
*based on evidence that was to be presented in a bunch of court cases that failed because the judges refused to hear them for one bullshit reason or another.
TIL a lack of evidence is a bullshit reason. Huh. I guess that's why you're a lawyer, and I'm not. My bad.
Courts let OJ go scot free. I guess you're still looking for the "real killer" since the courts said there was a lack of evidence.
The difference there is that if you ran that trial 60 times with different people involved in the process, he would have been convicted probably many many times.
Yes, because OJ was innocent. Also, this is different, because there is actual evidence of the opposite of your claim.