The difference there is that if you ran that trial 60 times with different people involved in the process, he would have been convicted probably many many times.
It's the same situation, friendo: people who felt aggrieved for really their own community's faults blatantly ignore the facts and the law to get 'justice'.
You could rerun it a hundred times, and each time the jurors' feelings would triumph over facts and rule of law - because that's what matters to them, their feelings. This is really the only criticism anyone has ever had of Trump, that their feelings were hurt.
He's a piece of shit that loves to screw over contractors. He ran a fraud university, a fraud charity. He put his children in high places. He's golfed about 100 million into his own pocket. He lies all the time. He's a man child that would insult and call people childish names on twitter. He increased the deficit by an insane amount even before covid. He stopped reporting civ casualties from drone strikes and gave the CIA full authority to do therm without presidential approvals. He almost started WW3 with Iran. His tariffs were idiotic and paid by the American people. His wall was stupid. His rhetoric is incredibly divisive, us vs them in nearly every speech.
I could go on.
The only thing???
60 different courts threw out the cases for lack of standing or lack of evidence, or that they wanted something ridiculous as the resolution. You can't say they were all biased.
So basically nothing much in the grand scheme of things.
"Stupid", "childish", "mean". Your username should be WrestlingWithFeelings.
The 9th circuit established early on that courts were also struggling with their feelings so I guess you are in 'good' company among those whose brain has been broken by 'bad' man.
The difference there is that if you ran that trial 60 times with different people involved in the process, he would have been convicted probably many many times.
It's the same situation, friendo: people who felt aggrieved for really their own community's faults blatantly ignore the facts and the law to get 'justice'.
You could rerun it a hundred times, and each time the jurors' feelings would triumph over facts and rule of law - because that's what matters to them, their feelings. This is really the only criticism anyone has ever had of Trump, that their feelings were hurt.
The ONLY criticism?
He's a piece of shit that loves to screw over contractors. He ran a fraud university, a fraud charity. He put his children in high places. He's golfed about 100 million into his own pocket. He lies all the time. He's a man child that would insult and call people childish names on twitter. He increased the deficit by an insane amount even before covid. He stopped reporting civ casualties from drone strikes and gave the CIA full authority to do therm without presidential approvals. He almost started WW3 with Iran. His tariffs were idiotic and paid by the American people. His wall was stupid. His rhetoric is incredibly divisive, us vs them in nearly every speech.
I could go on.
The only thing???
60 different courts threw out the cases for lack of standing or lack of evidence, or that they wanted something ridiculous as the resolution. You can't say they were all biased.
So basically nothing much in the grand scheme of things.
"Stupid", "childish", "mean". Your username should be WrestlingWithFeelings.
The 9th circuit established early on that courts were also struggling with their feelings so I guess you are in 'good' company among those whose brain has been broken by 'bad' man.
You have very low standards if you think all of that means nothing.