Until Twitter can come up with good rebuttals to the Navarro Report, the Lott Report, Pulitzer’s testimony in GA, & other hearings held in the swing states, there will always be a strong case for election fraud and a stolen election. No amount of censorship will change this. - Conspiracies

Until Twitter can come up with good rebuttals to the Navarro Report, the Lott Report, Pulitzer’s testimony in GA, & other hearings held in the swing states, there will always be a strong case for election fraud and a stolen election. No amount of censorship will change this. (twitter.com)

posted 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl +47 / -10

7 comments

7 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (7)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– vanillabluesea 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

What have people stopped talking about after the Jan. 06?

Voter Fraud.

After the senators challenged electoral votes on the Jan. 06; it was supposed to be the so called big reveal on the 6th (probably Italy Gate) that ordinary Trump supporters (and people who're still interested in finding out more about the voter frauds) would want to talk about + then would want to demand more detailed evidences about the gate.

But, unfortunately, after the 6th, no one wants to know about how many senators planned to challenge electoral votes and why, and now it's all about MAGA mob's Capitol invasion.

permalink save report block reply