If I offer a video with the title "real" and one consents to it by believing or not believing the title "real", then I created a conflict between all those who believe and those who don't believe.
If I offer a video with the title "not real" and one consents to it by not believing or believing the title "not real", then I created a conflict between all those who believe and those who don't believe.
It is my offer; not the offered, that creates a conflict, between those who consented to my offer; not the offered. Their consent to my offer gives me control over their actions, because I'm in total control about what is offered.
My intent is the control through conflict, based on consent to offer; not what those within the conflict believe or not believe.
If I offer a video with the title "real" and one consents to it by believing or not believing the title "real", then I created a conflict between all those who believe and those who don't believe. If I offer a video with the title "not real" and one consents to it by not believing or believing the title "not real", then I created a conflict between all those who believe and those who don't believe. It is my offer; not the offered, that creates a conflict, between those who consented to my offer; not the offered. Their consent to my offer gives me control over their actions, because I'm in total control about what is offered. My intent is the control through conflict, based on consent to offer; not what those within the conflict believe or not believe.
This guy gets it.
I don't. Could you elaborate?
I watched both clips and heard gunshot both times.