Like this dude making random claims that tactical police, who had just shot a protester, were escorting protesters into the chamber – who then supported his claim by intentionally cropping a photo.
Maybe this tweet that claimed a sudden 2 A.M. vote flip to democrats in Dekalb County, despite democrats leading in that county all day and night and thus making it literally impossible to have flipped to them.
The most deceptive person is the one that's been backed into a corner. Since November, that's been Trump. Be aware of who has the most to gain from peddling falsities. After all, that's what justifies most of our credible conspiracies.
I totally agree both can be true. However, bear in mind how much of that "evidence" has been peddled by the same people that are now spreading easily discernable disinformation. Character evidence -- a present act that is used to prove the likelihood of a similar, past act -- is barred in court, but fortunately this isn't a courtroom.
That's a valid opinion, and I totally warrant first-hand evidence that isn't fancy or graphical.
The issue, in my opinion, is that we've gone far past this kind of first-hand evidence. There was a top post the other day that was legit just a bunch of blank, unsubmitted ballots. Half of the post-December comments are crackhead legal arguments that arose on TDW and, despite being flatly rejected in court, were still promulgated because Trump and MAGA continued to push them. I just don't see any good faith arguments being posed anymore.