What is there to analyze? Ron Watkins and his father Jim are two con artists on a power trip with the Q LARP they’ve been running for years now. He has nothing of value to offer and nothing he could possibly “reveal” will have any effect on the election or the world. This is very obvious.
It’s not worth my time. Anytime I (and others here) have gone out of my way to thoughtfully educate someone with properly sourced facts and context, it usually results in the usual onslaught of racist, homophobicverbal abuse or abandonment of the topic. No one is here to have their mind changed.
Why would I bother writing up a thoughtful rebuttal or explanation when all I’m going to get in response is “go back to reddit nigger”?
No one here wants their mind changed, no one is actually in pursuit of truth. They simply want to have their biases confirmed and be among others like themselves.
I don’t have evidence regarding whether or not Santa Claus exists, but my intuition hasn’t led me astray on that one. I file Jim Watkins and his pathetic son in the same category.
What is there to analyze? Ron Watkins and his father Jim are two con artists on a power trip with the Q LARP they’ve been running for years now. He has nothing of value to offer and nothing he could possibly “reveal” will have any effect on the election or the world. This is very obvious.
So make a post or two about it. Show the forum your evidence and reasoning and convince people.
It’s not worth my time. Anytime I (and others here) have gone out of my way to thoughtfully educate someone with properly sourced facts and context, it usually results in the usual onslaught of racist, homophobicverbal abuse or abandonment of the topic. No one is here to have their mind changed.
but it IS somehow worth your time to go into threads and shit on other peoples' work and opinions.
sounds more like being lazy and unable to handle criticism.
tearing down others is easy. building something & convincing others you have ideas worth following takes work.
ciao
Why would I bother writing up a thoughtful rebuttal or explanation when all I’m going to get in response is “go back to reddit nigger”?
No one here wants their mind changed, no one is actually in pursuit of truth. They simply want to have their biases confirmed and be among others like themselves.
Do you have any evidence for your claims?
Which claim?
I don’t have evidence regarding whether or not Santa Claus exists, but my intuition hasn’t led me astray on that one. I file Jim Watkins and his pathetic son in the same category.
That is your claim. Now, where is your evidence.
False equivalence fallacy and borderline reductio ad absurdum.
Care to try this again?
Why did you make a new account minuet?