Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

6
Most accurate news source- sadly (en.m.wikipedia.org)
posted 4 years ago by ITOLDYOUSO 4 years ago by ITOLDYOUSO +7 / -1
7 comments share
7 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (7)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– tracheotome 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

You think Wikipedia is accurate? Wow.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ITOLDYOUSO [S] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

My point was that anything labeled as a conspiracy theory was probably the truth hiding in plains sight.

Whooosh

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– tracheotome 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Yes it’s my fault you were vague about your point. Yup. Totally on me.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ThePowerOfPrayer 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

From your wiki article-

New Coke

A theory claims that The Coca-Cola Company intentionally changed to an inferior formula with New Coke, with the intent either of driving up demand for the original product or permitting the reintroduction of the original with a new formula using cheaper ingredients.[20] Coca-Cola president Donald Keough rebutted this charge: "The truth is, we're not that dumb, and we're not that smart."[21]

They did replace the real sugar in the ingredients of Coke Classic with high fructose corn syrup. Mexican Coke (the kind that comes in a bottle and is made with sugar) is like the original product we drank in the early 1980s.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– KennyLiquorbush 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Wilipedia is blatant globalist propaganda.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– ITOLDYOUSO [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I was talking specifically about the conspiracy theories page. Most everything on there is true.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– PuritanCrusader 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Its useful for some things but mainly just dates and general info to start real research.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - qpl2q (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy