That "debunking" is just the Georgia officials saying it was debunked. The same Georgia officials complicit in the fraud and the same Georgia officials that are blocking an audit of Fulton county, which contains the cesspool of corruption that is Atlanta. I'm glad the riggers are able to assure me that no rigging took place while observers weren't even in the room.
See my other response to you, there's already been an audit. Observers are not required to be in the room, as my link makes clear. Of course, there's also this, this, this, and this — but sure, they're wrong too, there couldn't possibly be any acceptable explanation other than fraud.
This obviously has nothing to do with you being too committed to your position to admit you're wrong. It's not like this view is so rejected that it's literally had to escape to an eco-chamber website to be heard. News publishers definitely aren't retracting stories supporting election fraud out of fear of defamation lawsuits. The U.S. judiciary writ large totally hasn't categorically rejected election fraud claims.
Funny how the debunking article doesn't encourage readers to watch the video for them selves. They don't "put away ballots" under the table "thinking they were getting to go home" right before most people leave. The cases had been there all day and at one point one of the guys that stays late, checks on the cases in the middle of the day.
Cue salty MAGA boys that wanted more election fraud.
What's the hot MSM take on the video in GA of suitcases being pulled out from under the table after observers had left?
Not sure about the MSM, but here's the primary right-aligned, local newspaper debunking the suitcase claim.
Case closed fellas, it's been deboooonked
Yes, the riggers said they didn't rig! Pack it up boys
I know right, thanks!
That "debunking" is just the Georgia officials saying it was debunked. The same Georgia officials complicit in the fraud and the same Georgia officials that are blocking an audit of Fulton county, which contains the cesspool of corruption that is Atlanta. I'm glad the riggers are able to assure me that no rigging took place while observers weren't even in the room.
See my other response to you, there's already been an audit. Observers are not required to be in the room, as my link makes clear. Of course, there's also this, this, this, and this — but sure, they're wrong too, there couldn't possibly be any acceptable explanation other than fraud.
This obviously has nothing to do with you being too committed to your position to admit you're wrong. It's not like this view is so rejected that it's literally had to escape to an eco-chamber website to be heard. News publishers definitely aren't retracting stories supporting election fraud out of fear of defamation lawsuits. The U.S. judiciary writ large totally hasn't categorically rejected election fraud claims.
Funny how the debunking article doesn't encourage readers to watch the video for them selves. They don't "put away ballots" under the table "thinking they were getting to go home" right before most people leave. The cases had been there all day and at one point one of the guys that stays late, checks on the cases in the middle of the day.