Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

34
()
posted 5 years ago by KeithDudemeister 5 years ago by KeithDudemeister +35 / -1
15 comments share
15 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (15)
sorted by:
▲ 6 ▼
– Cheesemaker 6 points 5 years ago +6 / -0

It was a fairly "clean" explosion. I think it could have been some explosion generated EMP directed at the complex nextdoor.

If the goal was to destroy that facility, they didn't do a very good job. But if it was to instead knock out or permanently damage the electronics inside, this makes sense.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Parabolical 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

I was thinking that too. There’s also a hazardous line right where the explosion happened if you look in google maps. It’s labeled in clockwise order from the top: Red 4, Yellow 1, White W with a line through it, and Blue 3. I heard the “W” means it reacts violently to water, whatever it is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Cheesemaker 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Nice catch on the NFPA Diamond. It's rated as 3 (Health) - 4 (Fire) - 1 (Instability) - W "Use no water" This is a very odd NFPA code, because instability 2 is automatic when it chemically reacts to water. In order to be "1" it can only have a reaction under high heat. In otherwords combining W and instability 1 means it will react to water, but only when there is high heat.

I found no common chemicals that meets a 3-4-1-W code: https://www.northeastern.edu/ehs/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/NFPA-Hazard-Rating-Information-for-Common-Chemicals-A-C.htm https://www.northeastern.edu/ehs/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/NFPA-Hazard-Rating-Information-for-Common-Chemicals-D-I.htm https://www.northeastern.edu/ehs/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/NFPA-Hazard-Rating-Information-for-Common-Chemicals-J-R.htm https://www.northeastern.edu/ehs/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/NFPA-Hazard-Rating-Information-for-Common-Chemicals-S-Z.htm

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– illiac-iv 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Might be the aggregate rating for several chemicals stored there.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Parabolical 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Thanks for the links! I’ve been searching for any sort of clue, but I haven’t had any luck either. I wonder if it’s an older custom sign and the codes have changed through the years? Maybe you’re right about it being odd and has been updated officially, but they just never updated the sign.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Cheesemaker 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

The links aren't a complete list of codes, as there are a lot of custom ones for specific chemicals. But for a pipeline i'd think it was more likely to be a common chemical.

It could also be the "facility" is rated that way. I'm not sure how the signs on a side of a building (vs on the side of a gas tank) works as it might just be a warning to firefighters for the building as a whole.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Parabolical 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

True. I was just thinking it could also mean that they store that chemical. I jumped to the conclusion of thinking it was a pipe because of the bricks protruding from the wall, but it looks to just be an architectural design choice.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– MookMook 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Didn't realize that on the "reacts with water" note thank you. I could not find any chemical with the ratings on the sign either. Very odd...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– PutinLovesCats 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

So, what's your theory?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Thisisnotanexit 0 points 5 years ago +1 / -1

Not OP but I think it was a directed missle explosion https://duckduckgo.com/?q=2020+designated+missle+explosion+aftermath&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– illiac-iv 3 points 5 years ago +3 / -0

It might sound strange, but that does not look like a powerful bomb to me. Basically a leaf blower.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– illiac-iv 1 point 5 years ago +1 / -0

Ventilator fail, lol Boomer perp was a smoker, so that's where the soot is from.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Cheesemaker 2 points 5 years ago +2 / -0

Also, for anyone trying to match up the picture to the google streetview, the image in this post appears to be taken from where the blue dumpster is inside the building. You can tell from the window pattern across the street and the edge of the bricks (that have that weird metal(?) cover over the edge).

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Thisisnotanexit 1 point 5 years ago +2 / -1

Seroously fucked up! How are people not catching the drift?! Sick sad world.

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy