There are key points for the NSA to intercept communications. The theory is that the AT&T and the NSA intercept points are connected somehow. If this is true, the "bombing" was about poking out an NSA "eye" to hide something.
Also, note that the communications building that was hit was battle hardened, so a typical bomb would not hurt it. It correlates with the theory that the RV was just cover, and the real explosion was from a bunker buster missile.
im guesing the lit up areas are still active even though AT&T is down, wich would mean they have special access or a backup system to garuntee service. both of wich would require strings in big places
Some narration of what we are looking at might help people understand if or why this is significant.
There are key points for the NSA to intercept communications. The theory is that the AT&T and the NSA intercept points are connected somehow. If this is true, the "bombing" was about poking out an NSA "eye" to hide something.
Also, note that the communications building that was hit was battle hardened, so a typical bomb would not hurt it. It correlates with the theory that the RV was just cover, and the real explosion was from a bunker buster missile.
im guesing the lit up areas are still active even though AT&T is down, wich would mean they have special access or a backup system to garuntee service. both of wich would require strings in big places