There is an election fraud conspiracy, but it's not the one you think.
Trump supporters have been played for fools. The court cases, the constant appearances from Trump team lawyers and sycophants on media outlets like Fox, OAN and NewsMax, the endless Twitter and Parler posts, the ongoing bombardment of memes and other low-energy posts on social media and the retarded "hearings" that Republicans have held across the swing states have all been done for one purpose and one purpose alone... to line the pockets of Donald J. Trump through the America First Super Pac.
Of course Trump doesn't want to lose the presidency, but it's not because he gives a fuck about you or any of his supporters. It's because the free ride is over. Did you know that unless you donated more than $2,000 to Trump's legal defense, that money went to the Super Pac instead of the legal defense fund? Did you know that Trump raised nearly a quarter of a billion dollars on the backs of people like you believing they were helping to keep American elections free from foreign interference and domestic malfeasance but were really just throwing their money into a Trump slush fund where he could spend it however he wants?
You know who's not paying for Sidney Powell's "Kraken" lawsuits? Trump. You know who didn't pay for the Texas lawsuit? Trump. The last I've seen, Trump has spent around $8.8 million on his legal defense. Do you know how much he raised from poor suckers? $207 million.
Hell, Trump even started a media firm with a $2.2 million infusion for the sole purpose of raising money for the cause. Why in the world would he start a marketing company that's sole purpose is to engage his supporters for donations if he didn't think the return would be 10 times what he needed?
Granted, these numbers are from a few weeks ago, so I'm sure he's raised a lot more and spent a bit more since then.
Yes, there is a conspiracy afoot, but it's not about voting machines, mail-in ballots, dead people voting, illegal immigrants voting, people crossing state lines to vote... no. The conspiracy is that Trump is using this to raise as much money as possible before he sails off into the sunset. Also, Melania won't be able to get the Super Pac money in the divorce.
I'm a free-thinking individual with no allegiances other than to the truth and reason. What's more likely... That there was a secret cabal of international actors and thousands and thousands of Americans working in conjunction to forge an election or one butt hurt president who wants to make as much money as he can from his cult before they kick him out on his ass in a month?
What free-thinking low effort smooth brained take your post is.
The people telling you to "trust the science" about climate change and vaccine effectiveness are then telling you the science related to voter fraud is untrustworthy. It's the same science.
But then why wouldn't they just hear the evidence and put his shit on blast officially for all the world to see ?
That's what I don't get ... If he doesn't have evidence then let him get spanked in court ?
They have gotten spanked in court. Showing up without evidence means your case is tossed. If you sue someone for hitting your car but they don't have a car and live in another state, well, your lawsuit gets thrown out.
Rudy himself said the lawsuits weren't about fraud.
This comment proves you’re a shill. All cases have been tossed on procedure alone, not merits. I am an attorney with two Decades of experience. Don’t try to pretend I’m wrong.
One quick Google search shows the landmark case in Pennsylvania was tossed because the claims "have no merit."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2020/11/27/trump-campaign-pennsylvania-election-lawsuit-fails-again-court-says-claims-have-no-merit/
If you're a lawyer and not a liar, you're probably a bad one.
“Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so,” U.S. Circuit Judge Stephanos Bibas, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, wrote in the court’s ruling. “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”
Keep “googling” for “Forbes” articles and try to find the actual truth. Next time pull the opinion and read it yourself.
Did the judge write that in his ruling or not? Because his statement completely blows your case out of the water.
Oh, you know what. He did! It's literally the first paragraph of the ruling.
https://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/203371np.pdf
Bad lawyer bad.
Weren't there only a small handful (3 I believe ) coming from Trumps actual legal team? And those were constitutional suits where they wanted to clearly state this wasn't a fraud case ? The only one where a judge ruled on the evidence was in NV, which was suspect because the judge promised to read like 1k affidavits overnight and give a judgment in the morning. That case I believe the outcome was something technical like no standing. No offivial comment on the actual evidence.
Do you have a screen grab of that 2k superpac fine print ? I donated but couldn't seem to find that fact in the terms and conditions.
I do remember trying to search for something regarding the lawsuits last month and EVERY results was one of dozens of msm articles all.with the same headline that trump is raising funds because his campaign is in debt. So you know if ALL Media outlets are reporting it , it's probably not true.
https://ibb.co/5sZ488W