EXACTLY. The holocaust narrative uses such an expensive execution method:

1. Pack them on trains (why not simply execute on-site like the Soviets often did?)
2. Line them up into extremely crammed spaces (which is unable to withstand massive revolt)
3. Gas them (not exactly cheap compared to simply using bullets, which were already being manufactured en masse due to the war effort)

If Germany wanted to commit a genocide, why not just shoot and starve people like the USSR was doing? That worked amazingly well... they were able to kill some 30 million to 60 million people, almost an order of magnitude more than what was allegedly killed in the holocaust. You'd think Germany would simply follow their Big Red Neighbor's example... but noooo... German efficiency demands that we kill them and dispose of the bodies using an elaborate, expensive, and infeasible Rube Goldberg Machine--while we're in the middle of a massive multi-front war with pretty much the entire planet. Riiiiiight...

The censorship aspect is also a telltale sign, as you say. Why arrest people for questioning the truth if the truth is self-evident? People aren't arrested for saying the sky is green, even though it's clearly blue--why arrest them for saying Germany didn't commit the holocaust, if they clearly did?

I mean it does make sense, Nazi soldiers show up in the overpopulated poor neighborhoods, tell people to enter the trains because they will be taken to camps "for their own safety", people trust their government and board the train, gets a hot shower while their clothes is being deloused and are then living in the camps, forced to work. Just like in Gulag or any other forced labor camp at the time, only with better living conditions.

Precisely. And as you say, German camps were FAR better than Gulags. There were still ugly things that happened there, but much, much less than what is claimed. And sometimes they were downright pleasant, for a labor camp. The Gulags were where the real holocaust occurred. It was the Soviet Union who killed the Jews and blamed it on the Germans. See my comments below for more info.

What's scary about all this is the similarities to the FEMA camps, and the fact that nobody mentions the Typhus pandemic going on at the time back then, affecting mostly poor people. Seems to be only a question of time before poor Americans are sent to FEMA camps "for their own safety", forcefully vaccinated against covid with experimental medicine, then basically living there and working, just like in the concentration camps.

Right. I'm also quite concerned about AOC's / Kamala Harris's "re-education" camps which sound all too similar to the Gulags. Sounds like a mass-genocide of conservatives / Christians / white people is on the way... check out this essay by Eustace Mullins which I linked to below: There's a Gulag In Your Future

It was a well orchestrated abyssal ruse. Who better to do it than the experts of Luciferianism themselves? Just look at where the concentration camps were in relation to the communist/Soviet occupation of West Germany until the Iron Curtain fell..... Plenty of time to manipulate the data and even take photos that the Germans were trying to gather to illustrate the monstrous demonic scenes of utter horror they encountered during the Blitzkrieg through the Soviet front line. The Soviets knew what they could do to their fellow Jewish countrymen and took advantage of it because they knew they'd go turncoat on the Soviets. The communists HATED the actually religious Jews. Think about the cattle trains with no windows they were loaded up on and were TOLD they were being taken into Nazi Germany... WHOOPS, they were actually being taken to fucking GULAGS! ?

Gulag Archipelago actually illustrates this phenomenon in detail. If you read this essay by Eustace Mullins, you'll see exactly what happened: https://archive.org/details/mullins-e.-c.-theres-a-gulag-in-your-future-1976

On page 389, Volume Two of [The Gulag Archipelago], we find a very significant passage:

"But some transports of condemned zeks arrived too late, and they continued to arrive with five to ten people at a time. A detachment of killers would receive them at the Old Brickyard station and lead them to the old bathhouse to a booth lined with three or four layers of blankets inside. There the condemned prisoners were ordered to undress in the snow and enter the bath naked. Inside, they were shot with pistols. In the course of one and a half months about two hundred persons were destroyed in this way. The corpses were burned in the tundra."

In this passage, Solzhenitsyn is describing the execution of Trotskyite prisoners at a Moscow train station in April 1938. It sounds all too familiar, because hundreds of pages of sworn testimony describing these incidents were taken down at the Nuremberg Trials and used to condemn the legally elected officials of the German nation to be executed for "war crimes"! How did this come about? When the German Army made its lightning dash into Russia in June of 1941, the Soviet leaders realized that Jews in the captured border cities would be the first to collaborate with their conquerors. Stalin ordered all the Jews in the path of the German advance to be rounded up and hauled to the interior on cattle trains. Many of them were sealed, and most of them had no food or water. As a result, many thousands of Jews died in horrible circumstances. Also in the path of the German advance were a number of huge Soviet slave labor camps. There was no possibility of evacuating them, and the Russian guards herded prisoners into large groups and massacred them with machine gun fire. When the Germans captured these areas, they were stunned to find large mounds of unburied corpses.

In order to have proof of the savage mentality of the Communist commissars, the Germans methodically photographed the scenes of these massacres, and took statements from some survivors who had fled into the woods. At Nuremberg, in order to have a legal excuse for killing the captured Germans, the victors changed the statements and photos to read "German guards" where they had formerly read "Russian guards" and changed the locale of the massacres to read "Auschwitz", "Dachau" and other German camp areas instead of the true Russian ones.

Eustace worked at the Library of Congress for some 20 years and read thousands of books. So he would have actually had access to the original Nurmberg Trials transcripts (which were thousands of pages long) kept in their archives. You can view online facsimiles at the Library of Congress website here: https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/NT_major-war-criminals.html

But, they're so enormous you'll never read it all. However, Eustace had a photographic memory. He had read large portions of the Nuremberg Trials, if not the whole thing, so when he read The Gulag Archipelago, he could compare his photographic memory of the Nuremberg Trials with the exact same stories occurring in the gulags. He did not make things up, and he was a brilliant scholar (contrary to popular opinion and the ADL's slander about him).

As u/fsoawesome pointed out also, Carlos W. Porter wrote a fascinating book called Made in Russia: The Holocaust (good book review, digital edition, hard copy). He actually digs through these very trial transcripts from Nuremberg and shows not only which ones were absurdly nonsensical, but which were directly manufactured in Russia. One of the very people in charge of manipulating these photographs, captions, and even making fakes, was Sergei Eisenstein, one of the only filmmakers in the USSR. It was a ruse from start to finish. Russia needed to explain where all the Jews' bodies went (killed in Gulags), and defeated Germany provided the perfect scapegoat.

Germany has also paid Israel hundreds of billions (if not trillions) of dollars since WWII, due to this misplaced blame. Who'd want to get rid of such a sweet gig? Certainly not Israel. Check out this short clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRrfnGvSJDw

First, you probably guessed, this photo is likely from a gulag.

Second, hope you're reading the multi-volume edition vs the abbreviated edition.

Third, check this out: Made in Russia (https://app.thebookpatch.com/BookStore/made-in-russia/18ae1db3-acea-4454-b3e1-6870dadd3522)

You are right, there was a ton of intrigue in the Nazi leadership. I wouldn't call them the "good guys." But there's always two sides to every story. There was a major split in the Nazi movement, which is covered very well in a book called: The Strange Death of Adolf Hitler. Furthermore, Leon Degrelle wrote about it in his book called: Hitler Democrat. The Night of the Long Knives is covered extremely well in both of those books, no other material compares.

Also, Soviet Russia had FAR more blood on their hands. See my previous comments about the gulags.

This is an interesting video about Hitler's early life and artwork, as well as the aforementioned book: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m6TQFrECvgQ

• Source book: warning, this book is VERY graphic, but it gives lots of details about Hitler's personality, more than any other book: The Strange Death of Adolf Hitler

I also highly recommend you watch this documentary series: https://www.bitchute.com/playlist/hmv3AI5oVvJm/

The first three parts are especially recommended. The rest is unnecessary, but also informative.

Here is a very good article by Hitler's Jewish doctor, who tells about his early childhood and what he was like as a boy: http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n3p27_bloch.html

This is a good book which retells WWII from the German perspective, but it holds no special treatment for the Nazis. It tells what both sides did in all the gory details: https://www.amazon.com/GERMANYS-WAR-Origins-Aftermath-Atrocities/dp/0982344899

I also highly recommend this book by Gerd Schultze-Rhonhof, 1939 - The War That Had Many Fathers. It utterly debunks the traditional idea that Germany was solely responsible for the outbreak of war.